Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658837›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Efficacy and safety of 15 mA transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) in the therapy of treatment-resistant depression with increased inflammatory activity: Study protocol for a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.

Xuguang An, Jin Zhang, Xiaofei Hou, Chenghao Yang

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06812923 (The Study on Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Treating Increased Inflammatory Activity Refractory Depression), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06812923 narecruitingnot on this map

The Study on Effectiveness and Mechanisms of Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation in Treating Increased Inflammatory Activity Refractory Depression

TypeinterventionalSponsorTianjin Anding HospitalRan2025 to 2028Enrolled52ConditionsTreatment Resistant Depression (TRD), InflammationArmstranscranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS), Sham stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xuguang AnTianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin Mental Health Center, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
Jin ZhangTianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin Mental Health Center, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
Xiaofei HouTianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin Mental Health Center, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.
Chenghao YangTianjin Anding Hospital, Tianjin Mental Health Center, Hexi District, Tianjin, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3424-6004

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesTreatment-resistant depression (TRD) poses a significant clinical challenge, with traditional antidepressant therapies often ineffective. Elevated peripheral inflammation has emerged as a potential biological subtype of TRD, highlighting the need for novel treatments. Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has garnered attention for its potential antidepressant effects, particularly through its impact on glial cells, which are involved in neuroinflammation and neuronal interactions. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of high-intensity (15 mA) tACS in TRD patients with elevated inflammatory activity.

methodsThis randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial will recruit 70 participants based on C-reactive protein levels (0.85-10 mg/L) and Dutch Method for Staging Therapy-Resistant Depression scores (DM-TRD, > 12.5). The study involves a 4-week tACS/sham intervention followed by an 8-week follow-up. The primary endpoint includes changes in the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores from baseline to week 4. Secondary endpoints include MADRS scores at week 2, Self-rating depression and anxiety scale scores, response and remission rates, and the presence of epileptiform activity. It will explore the association between changes in MADRS scores and alterations in EEG parameters and/or concentrations of peripheral biomarkers. Safety assessments will monitor adverse events, vital signs, and ECG parameters, with serious adverse events defined by specific medical conditions. DISCUSSION: Understanding the contribution of inflammatory processes to the heterogeneity of depression may provide important insights into its underlying pathophysiological mechanisms and facilitate the identification of novel, mechanism-based therapeutic targets. In this context, the present study aims to explore the potential for the development of more effective, personalized treatment strategies tailored to depressive patients.

trial registrationAt ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06812923) on 02 February 2025. Protocol version: 15mA tACS 1.0.

Indexed as

Depressive Disorder, Treatment-ResistantInflammationTranscranial Direct Current StimulationAdultC-Reactive ProteinDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeC-Reactive Protein

Identifiers

PMID42658837
PMCPMC13521385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.