ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Identification of suicidal ideation in major depressive disorder: A machine learning approach with multimodal digital features.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current detection models for suicidal ideation (SI) among depressed patients have primarily relied on clinical and biological features. This study aims at enhancing the real-world applicability of these models by using multimodal digital features. Patients self-administered the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). Their multimodal features (facial, acoustic and linguistic features) were obtained using ecological momentary assessment (EMA) with our self-developed smartphone application over 7 days. The Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) were conducted to identify clinically rated SI. Mood description recordings obtained from EMA were processed through natural language processing, Openface, and OpenSmile to obtain linguistic, facial and acoustics features, respectively. Multimodal features and questionnaires were then used for training and testing machine learning algorithms. The study was conducted and reported under the TRIPOD+AI guideline. Among the recruited 99 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), 38 (mean age = 49.3 ± 9.7 y, 76% female) had SI while 61 (mean age = 51.5 ± 11.5 y, 76% female) did not have SI. Among the 10 machine learning models evaluated, the CatBoost classifier demonstrated the strongest detection performance, achieving an AUC of 0.79 (p < .001), accuracy of 0.79 and F1-score of 0.73. K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN), Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Naive Bayes models also provided comparable results. Multimodal features were correlated with SI among MDD patients. Machine learning algorithms have modest performance in identifying SI among patients with MDD using multimodal digital features, including facial expressions, vocal characteristics and language use. However, larger and more diverse datasets are needed to enhance the generalizability and accuracy of these machine learning approaches in real-world clinical settings.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.