ArticlePloS one2026
Sustainable gypsum binders reinforced with industrial and bio-waste additives.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to improve the mechanical strength, water resistance, and setting behavior of gypsum binders by adding industrial and agricultural waste. This study investigated the effects of ground orange peel powder, sodium silicate solution, and reactive silica on the functionality of gypsum composites intended for resource-efficient construction applications. Reactive silica (5-10%), GOPP (0-2%), and 20% sodium silicate solutions were added in different amounts to create nine mixtures. The compressive and flexural strengths, water absorption, and setting times were assessed. Scanning electron microscopy was used to monitor the microstructural development and comprehend the interactions between the additives and the gypsum matrix. The results showed that the ideal mixture (G7) consisting of 10% reactive silica, 20% sodium silicate solution, and 1% GOPP had a compressive strength of 16.9 MPa, flexural strength of 2.35 MPa, and low water absorption value of 5.41%. The GOPP successfully postponed the setting, enabling extended matrix densification and C-S-H formation. SEM analysis verified that the modified samples yielded better internal cohesion and lower porosity. This study presents a novel approach that combines organic and inorganic waste materials to enhance gypsum performance. GOPP offer waste-derived set-retarding qualities, in contrast to conventional chemical additives. The suggested process shows how gypsum properties can be improved using waste materials produced by various industries and agriculture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.