ArticlePLOS digital health2026
A novel inflammatory bowel disease registry powered by artificial intelligence and natural language processing.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Using natural language processing to extract information from clinical text in electronic medical records for populating clinical registries: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite substantial recent progress in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies, there remains a large proportion of patients who are non-responders or develop significant adverse events. Accurate data registries may assist clinicians and researchers to gain insights into IBD and provide opportunities to improve overall patient care. Most data registries are limited by the amount of time and resources needed to collect and record patient-level data. We describe and validate a novel IBD repository (IBD Data Lake), leveraging machine learning and natural language processing (NLP) techniques, as useful tools to curate and retrieve pertinent, real-time clinical data in the IBD population. Structured and unstructured data were extracted from patients' electronic medical record and were transferred to a secure cloud infrastructure and curated into a searchable database. A customized user interface was created, and an advanced NLP service (Comprehend Medical) was employed to extract clinical information from unstructured data from medical documents. Chart review served as the gold standard for validation. Between July 1, 2018 and July 31, 2023, 208 (104 IBD and 104 matched non-IBD) patients were retrieved. The IBD Data Lake's performance metrics for identifying IBD patients were as follows: sensitivity 98.1%, specificity 97.1%, and accuracy 97.6%. The machine learning/NLP components demonstrated high performance in analyzing key IBD characteristics: for distinction of ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease, sensitivity was 100% and specificity 98.2%; for smoking status, sensitivity was 100% and specificity 96.9%; and for extraintestinal manifestations, sensitivity was 92% and specificity 100%. A novel IBD Data Lake that integrates machine learning and NLP techniques has been established and validated. IBD patients were identified with high accuracy and the machine learning/NLP components enable comprehensive and timely data extraction. This will ultimately lay the groundwork for recruitment of specific IBD cohorts of interest to address the gaps that remain in our knowledge.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.