ArticleThe American journal of case reports2026
Robot-Assisted Surgery Requiring an Intraoperative Transition to Laparoscopic Surgery Due to an Emergency System Shutdown: A Case Report.
Article in The American journal of case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted hysterectomy (RASH) for benign uterine disease has been covered by insurance in Japan since 2018. Our department introduced RASH in December 2020, and the number of procedures has increased without major complications. Herein, we report a case in which robot-assisted surgery required intraoperative conversion to conventional laparoscopy because of an unexpected robotic system shutdown. CASE REPORT A 54-year-old multiparous woman presented with hypermenorrhea and anemia caused by uterine adenomyosis. After unsuccessful conservative treatment, definitive surgical management was planned. Following 6 months of gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog therapy, RASH was performed using the da Vinci X system. Four robotic ports and a single 5-mm assistant port were placed. Total operative time was 202 minutes, including 148 minutes of console time. After transvaginal uterine removal and vaginal cuff closure, the robotic system suddenly underwent an emergency shutdown during confirmation of hemostasis, making intracorporeal manipulation impossible. Although the manufacturer was contacted immediately and troubleshooting was attempted, the system could not be restored. Therefore, the operation was converted to conventional laparoscopic surgery using the same port placement, and the procedure was completed successfully. The postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient was discharged without complications. CONCLUSIONS Robot-assisted surgery is increasingly used in gynecology because of its minimally invasive advantages. However, surgeons should be prepared for unexpected events such as robotic system failure. Familiarity with laparoscopic surgical techniques enables safe continuation of surgery in such situations. This case highlights the importance of maintaining laparoscopic surgical skills to ensure the safe performance of robot-assisted procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.