Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658776›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Digital mental health apps for young people in Europe: A systematic cross-country analysis.

Alba Madrid Cagigal, Canan Citil Akyol, Nesime Can Angın, João Ferreira, Karolina Gabor-Siatkowska, Niko Männikkö, Anna Meyniel, Neslihan Önder Özdemir, Miloš Stojadinović, Vanesa Varga and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alba Madrid CagigalSchool of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4824-8307
Canan Citil AkyolDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Letters, Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1596-5097
Nesime Can AngınProgram of Guidance and Counseling, Faculty of Educational Sciences, Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.
João FerreiraInstitute of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9905-0849
Karolina Gabor-SiatkowskaInstitute of Telecommunications and Cybersecurity, Faculty of Electronics and Information Technology, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Niko MännikköCentre for Research and Innovation; Oulu University of Applied Sciences, Oulu, Finland.
Anna MeynielInternational Centre for Missing and Exploited Children, Alexandria, Virginia, United States of America.
Neslihan Önder ÖzdemirSchool of Foreign Languages, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Türkiye.
Miloš StojadinovićDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Niš, Niš, Serbia.
Vanesa VargaFaculty of Croatian Studies, University of Zagreb, Department for Communication Studies, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ine BeyensAmsterdam School of Communication Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Claudette PretoriusSchool of Computer Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mental health smartphone applications have become widely available for self-management and support, offering young people new pathways for help-seeking. Despite their increasing popularity, little is known about how app accessibility, content, and features vary across countries, languages, and cultural contexts. This study aimed to systematically examine these differences by drawing on data from the available app stores. Both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store were searched across seven European countries (Croatia, France, Ireland, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, and Türkiye) using four keywords: mental health, psychological wellbeing, self-help, and stress. App results were screened through redefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the included apps were systematically characterized based on their aims, features, and linguistic accessibility. Over 900 apps were initially identified, and 171 met the inclusion criteria. The most commonly encountered apps were structured journaling and meditation apps, and most were partially paid and primarily available in English, highlighting a predominance of commercially oriented apps and a limited availability of local-language apps and minimal cultural adaptation. Together, the findings underscore the need for research and policy to prioritize cross-country accessibility, particularly for non-English speaking youth, to ensure equitable access to digital mental health resources.

Identifiers

PMID42658776
PMCPMC13521388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.