ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Digital mental health apps for young people in Europe: A systematic cross-country analysis.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mental health smartphone applications have become widely available for self-management and support, offering young people new pathways for help-seeking. Despite their increasing popularity, little is known about how app accessibility, content, and features vary across countries, languages, and cultural contexts. This study aimed to systematically examine these differences by drawing on data from the available app stores. Both the Apple App Store and Google Play Store were searched across seven European countries (Croatia, France, Ireland, Poland, Portugal, Serbia, and Türkiye) using four keywords: mental health, psychological wellbeing, self-help, and stress. App results were screened through redefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the included apps were systematically characterized based on their aims, features, and linguistic accessibility. Over 900 apps were initially identified, and 171 met the inclusion criteria. The most commonly encountered apps were structured journaling and meditation apps, and most were partially paid and primarily available in English, highlighting a predominance of commercially oriented apps and a limited availability of local-language apps and minimal cultural adaptation. Together, the findings underscore the need for research and policy to prioritize cross-country accessibility, particularly for non-English speaking youth, to ensure equitable access to digital mental health resources.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.