ArticleCognitive science2026
Quantity Estimation by Repeated Comparative Judgments.
Article in Cognitive science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many species can discriminate nonsymbolic quantities, but only humans transform such perceptual magnitudes into symbolic numbers and mathematics. The process by which this transformation occurs remains debated. Here, we propose a computational model of human quantity estimation which synthesizes four general concepts established over the history of cognitive science: (1) nonsymbolic quantity representations; (2) a general capacity for comparative judgment; (3) associative memory; and (4) an anchoring-and-adjustment mechanism. We tested model predictions in preregistered experiments where participants estimated briefly displayed dot arrays. The model reproduced key psychophysical signatures of human quantity estimation across stimulus durations (100, 500, and 1000 ms) and replicated human calibration effects induced by exposure to veridical reference quantities. The results suggest that the psychophysics of symbolic estimation observed in humans can be explained by an extension of the evolutionarily ancient capacity for quantity discrimination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.