ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Fundamental limits incorporating logical reasoning into Shannon's information theory.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fundamental limits incorporating logical reasoning into Shannon's information theory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A cornerstone of Shannon's famous information theory is the idea of decoupling the meaning of a message from its efficient transmission. In this article, we propose an extension of Shannon's communication model where the sender and receiver are assumed to have reasoning capabilities. In such a setting, we gain insights by coupling the fields of information theory and mathematical logic. Under the assumption that a message is coming from a stochastic source, Shannon's theory establishes that the fundamental compression limit is the entropy of the source. Imagine, however, that we were not interested in the message itself, but rather, we were focused on the logical conclusions that one could derive from it. In this work, we obtain a closed-form expression for a fundamental compression limit in the presence of reasoning capabilities. Our expression is valid under various assumptions about what the sender and receiver know, providing initial answers to key questions such as how much the fundamental limit varies as one narrows or widens the amount of knowledge that is being transferred from sender to receiver, or how, surprisingly, such a fundamental limit remains the same even if the sender is unaware of what it is that a receiver already knows. We also offer practical algorithms that are empirically demonstrated to be significantly more efficient than alternatives that do not account for the existence of reasoning capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.