Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658762›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Fundamental limits incorporating logical reasoning into Shannon's information theory.

Luis A Lastras, Jonathan Lenchner, Barry M Trager, Wojciech Szpankowski, Mark S Squillante, Chai Wah Wu, Ronald Fagin, Alexander Gray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Fundamental limits incorporating logical reasoning into Shannon's information theory.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luis A LastrasIBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.ORCID 0009-0006-2792-220X
Jonathan LenchnerIBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.ORCID 0000-0002-9427-8470
Barry M TragerIBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.ORCID 0000-0001-9130-0284
Wojciech SzpankowskiDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.ORCID 0000-0001-9062-0067
Mark S SquillanteIBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.ORCID 0000-0002-5195-8441
Chai Wah WuIBM Research, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598.ORCID 0000-0002-0657-0683
Ronald FaginIBM Research, San Jose, CA 95141.ORCID 0000-0002-7374-0347
Alexander GrayDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907.ORCID 0000-0003-0337-7359

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cornerstone of Shannon's famous information theory is the idea of decoupling the meaning of a message from its efficient transmission. In this article, we propose an extension of Shannon's communication model where the sender and receiver are assumed to have reasoning capabilities. In such a setting, we gain insights by coupling the fields of information theory and mathematical logic. Under the assumption that a message is coming from a stochastic source, Shannon's theory establishes that the fundamental compression limit is the entropy of the source. Imagine, however, that we were not interested in the message itself, but rather, we were focused on the logical conclusions that one could derive from it. In this work, we obtain a closed-form expression for a fundamental compression limit in the presence of reasoning capabilities. Our expression is valid under various assumptions about what the sender and receiver know, providing initial answers to key questions such as how much the fundamental limit varies as one narrows or widens the amount of knowledge that is being transferred from sender to receiver, or how, surprisingly, such a fundamental limit remains the same even if the sender is unaware of what it is that a receiver already knows. We also offer practical algorithms that are empirically demonstrated to be significantly more efficient than alternatives that do not account for the existence of reasoning capabilities.

Indexed as

information theorymathematical logicreasoningsemantic communication

Identifiers

PMID42658762
PMCPMC13535204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.