Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658734›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

The Effect of Head Movements on Front-Back Discrimination and Sound Externalization With Hearing Aids.

Tobias Greif, Virginia Best, Robert Baumgartner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tobias GreifAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-4292-1441
Virginia BestDepartment of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Boston University, Boston, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5535-5736
Robert BaumgartnerAcoustics Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0003-0899-4903

Funding

Spatial Hearing in Speech MixturesR01DC015760 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI Virginia Ann Best · 2017 to 2026
$3.6M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015760
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head movements are intuitive, often spontaneous, behaviours that help us localize the origin of a sound source. In normal-hearing listeners, head movements during sound presentation are known to improve localization performance in both horizontal and vertical dimensions, as well as front-back discrimination. The perceived externalization of sound sources also improves with head motion. Hearing-aid users, especially users with behind-the-ear microphone positioning, exhibit diminished front-back localization abilities as well as degraded externalization under static conditions. The extent to which active head movements can overcome the spatial degradations introduced by hearing aids remains unclear. The current study aimed to provide quantitative data on this issue. Participants with normal hearing were fitted with low-gain hearing aids and presented with speech stimuli from a loudspeaker directly in front or behind. They performed front-back discrimination, rated perceived externalization, and did so with or without head movements. We hypothesized that head movements would fully resolve front-back confusions and restore externalization ratings to unaided levels. Instead, head movements were more effective in resolving front-back confusions than externalization breakdowns. We conclude that hearing-aid related spatial distortions may not be fully overcome by active head movements and note large inter-individual differences in the relationship between externalization and front-back discrimination.

Indexed as

Discrimination, PsychologicalHead MovementsHearing AidsSound LocalizationSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adultexternalizationhearing aidsself-motionspatial hearing

Identifiers

PMID42658734
PMCPMC13525295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.