Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658715›Full record

ArticleInfancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies

Touch Supports Word Segmentation More Than Statistics But is Not Mediated by Attention.

Amanda Seidl, Boshang Yin, Bridgette Kelleher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Touch Supports Word Segmentation More Than Statistics But is Not Mediated by Attention.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amanda SeidlDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9825-1462
Boshang YinDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3883-4186
Bridgette KelleherDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7966-1837

Funding

Touch to learn: How sensory cues impact word segmentation and learningR21HD108730 · NICHD · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI BOROVSKY, ARIELLE, SEIDL, AMANDA H · 2023 to 2024
$521k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD108730NIH HHS R21HD108730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multisensory information is integral to infants' language experiences and research has suggested that infants can use multisensory cues to support their segmentation of wordforms continuous speech. However, the role of multisensory cues in wordform segmentation compared to that of cues present in the acoustic stream alone (e.g., transitional probability) remains unclear. In the current study, we investigated word segmentation with aligned tactile cues in 8.5-month-old infants to explore how these infants weight tactile cues compared to, as well as in combination with, transitional probability cues. Aligned tactile cues had a significant impact on wordform segmentation and recognition performance as assessed through orientation time in Headturn Preference Procedure, while transitional probability cues did not have a significant impact. We also explored whether performance was related to attention as measured by heart rate defined sustained attention (HRDSA). Overall, duration of sustained attention assessed through HRDSA was associated with overall longer orientation times regardless of stimulus type, but HRDSA did not vary significantly with tactile cue presence/absence or transitional probabilities.

Indexed as

AttentionLanguage DevelopmentSpeech PerceptionTouchTouch PerceptionCuesFemaleHeart RateHumansInfantMaleattentionheart rateinfantsword segmentation

Identifiers

PMID42658715
PMCPMC13521298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.