Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658608›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2026

Toward High-Resolution Polymeric Neural Interfaces: A Practical Guide for Electron Beam Lithography.

Hanna Karlsson-Fernberg, Maria Asplund

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hanna Karlsson-FernbergDepartment of Microtechnology and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9481-483X
Maria AsplundDepartment of Microtechnology and Nanoscience, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8779-7478

Funding

European Union Horizon-EIC-2022-Pathfinder Open program 101099366European Union Horizon-EIC-2022-Pathfinder Open program BioFINE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron beam lithography (EBL) offers excellent opportunities to miniaturize and refine neurotechnological implants that serve important application domains such as the treatment of neurological conditions and interface the body with external machines. To improve the biocompatibility and signal resolution of the implantable part, miniaturization of the volume and scaling up the number of channels could enable improved long-term integration in tissue while at the same time extending the functionality. The standard is to pattern these devices using optical lithography, with a resolution limit at the microscale. In recent years, EBL has been employed to fabricate nanoscale electrical features on polymeric substrates. While plenty of data exist for EBL for standard material substrates such as silicon, challenges specific to polymeric substrates remain. These include charging of insulating materials, non-planarity, and heating of the substrate. This tutorial supports the understanding of thin-film micro- and nanofabrication process development for EBL to fabricate high-resolution neural implants. Furthermore, it serves as a guide for implementing EBL to achieve high-resolution structures, offering practical protocols for sub-micron features in polymer-based neuroprostheses, pushing this field closer to clinical implementation of these devices.

Indexed as

e‐beam lithographyminiaturizationnanotechnologyneurotechnologypolymeric substrates

Identifiers

PMID42658608
PMCPMC13521189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.