Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658511›Full record

Observational studyJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2026

Imaging-Detected Extranodal Extension in p16-Positive Oropharyngeal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of RTOG 1016.

Christopher W Fleming, Chandana A Reddy, Sarah Stock, Jonathan Lee, Maura Gillison, Jimmy J Caudell, Jessica L Geiger, Dukagjin M Blakaj, Greg A Krempl, A Dimitrios Colevas and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01302834 (Phase III Trial of Radiotherapy Plus Cetuximab Versus Chemoradiotherapy in HPV-Associated Oropharynx Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01302834 phase3completednot on this map

Phase III Trial of Radiotherapy Plus Cetuximab Versus Chemoradiotherapy in HPV-Associated Oropharynx Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadiation Therapy Oncology GroupRan2011 to 2025Enrolled987ConditionsHead and Neck Cancer, Precancerous ConditionArmscetuximab, cisplatin, IMRT
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Christopher W FlemingMaroone Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida.
Chandana A ReddyTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Sarah StockDiagnostic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Jonathan LeeDiagnostic Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Maura GillisonMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Jimmy J CaudellMoffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
Jessica L GeigerTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Dukagjin M BlakajThe Ohio State University Arthur James Cancer Center, Columbus.
Greg A KremplUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.
A Dimitrios ColevasStanford University, Stanford, California.
Christopher U JonesSutter Cancer Research Consortium, Roseville, California.
Nabil F SabaWinship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Jack PhanMD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Thomas J GallowayFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Samantha SeawardKaiser Permanente Northern California, Vallejo.
Sharon SpencerUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham.
Pedro Torres-SaavedraBiometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
Sue S YomUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Quynh-Thu LeStanford University, Stanford, California.
Shlomo A KoyfmanTaussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Imaging-detected extranodal extension (iENE) has been included in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) protocol tumor-node-metastasis 9th edition staging system (TNM9) for human papillomavirus (HPV)-mediated (p16-positive) oropharyngeal cancer (HPV-positive OPC). Objective: To confirm the new TNM9 staging system on a prospective dataset. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study included patients with HPV-positive OPC with clinically node-positive disease treated at 182 health care centers in the US and Canada and enrolled in the NRG Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 1016 trial between 2011 and 2014 were included. Deidentified images were reviewed between September and December 2021. Data were analyzed between May and September 2023. Exposure: Computed tomography simulation scans were reviewed by 2 expert head and neck radiologists documenting the presence of iENE. Main Outcomes and Measures: Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cumulative incidence curves were generated for locoregional failure (LRF) and distant metastasis. Univariate (UVA) and multivariate analyses (MVA) were performed incorporating iENE with other known prognostic factors. The TNM9 clinical nodal schema incorporating iENE was compared with the previous TNM8. Model goodness of fit and comparison of models was done using Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell concordance statistic (C index). Results: Of the 987 patients enrolled in NRG RTOG 1016, 586 met inclusion criteria (median age, 58 years [range, 33-83 years]; 534 male [91.1%]), 350 (60%) of whom had iENE. Median (IQR) follow-up was 4.2 (3.3-5.0) years. Patients with iENE had inferior 5-year OS (79.2% vs 87.0%; difference, 7.8% [95% CI, 1.2%-14.4%]) and 5-year PFS (68.8% vs 80.4%; difference, 11.6% [95% CI, 4.1%-19.2%]) compared with those without iENE. On MVA, iENE was independently associated with inferior OS (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.04-2.56) and PFS (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.24-2.57). TNM9 and TNM8 clinical nodal schemas had similar performance in terms of C index and AIC (TNM8: C, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.68-0.78]; AIC = 1109.34 vs TNM9: C, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.67-0.77]; AIC = 1112.70). Conclusions and Relevance: This study showed that the updated TNM9 clinical nodal schema, in which patients with iENE-positive disease are upstaged 1 stratum from their TNM8 clinical N category, discriminates better than the TNM8 category between patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01302834.

Indexed as

Extranodal ExtensionOropharyngeal NeoplasmsPapillomavirus InfectionsAgedClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicEquivalence Trials as TopicFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID42658511
PMCPMC13522994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.