Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658497›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

Cognitive Behavior vs Bright Light Therapy for Insomnia in Women Undergoing Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Trang Thuy Do, Jordan Maccora, Rebecca Wallace, Veronica Aedo-Lopez, Marliese Alexander, Sonia Ancoli-Israel, Bei Bei, Robert Blum, Frances Boyle, Daphne Day and 11 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Trang Thuy DoSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jordan MaccoraSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rebecca WallaceSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Veronica Aedo-LopezDepartment of Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Marliese AlexanderPharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sonia Ancoli-IsraelDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Bei BeiSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Robert BlumDepartment of Oncology, Bendigo Cancer Centre, Bendigo Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Frances BoylePatricia Ritchie Centre for Cancer Care and Research, Mater Hospital North Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Daphne DayDepartment of Oncology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Justine DiggensPeople and Culture, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Prudence A FrancisSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Maria FtanouDepartment of Psychology, Psychosocial Oncology Program, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Sheila N GarlandDepartment of Psychology, Memorial University, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Alysia KepertSchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Duncan MortimerCentre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew J K PhillipsAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health, Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (Sleep Health), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Sharad SharmaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Ballarat Regional Integrated Cancer Centre, Grampians Health, Ballarat, Victoria, Australia.
Lesley StaffordDepartment of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle WhiteGenomic Medicine and Parkville Familial Cancer Centre, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Joshua F WileySchool of Psychological Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer experience insomnia and fatigue, which impair quality of life. To date, no randomized clinical trial (RCT) has evaluated the use of cognitive behavior therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) and bright light therapy (BLT) both alone and in combination, and few have evaluated the use of either during chemotherapy. Objective: To determine the main effects of CBT-I and BLT on insomnia and fatigue symptoms in women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: Sleep, Cancer, Rest (SleepCARE) was a 6-week, 2 × 2 factorial, superiority, parallel RCT conducted at 5 metropolitan and regional hospitals in Australia from January 22, 2021, to August 21, 2024. Participants were women (aged ≥18 years) receiving chemotherapy for early or metastatic breast cancer. Interventions: Two brief interventions were administered: CBT-I and BLT alone (using light glasses at 1500 lux) and in combination, creating 4 groups (CBT-I alone, BLT alone, CBT-I plus BLT, and sleep hygiene education [SHE]). All interventions included SHE. The interventions lasted 6 weeks and included a 1:1 consultation session, emails sent once or twice per week, and a midpoint call for all groups, as well as light glasses for the BLT groups. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dual primary outcomes were Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) scores and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-Fatigue T scores. Both are patient-reported outcome measures and measure insomnia and fatigue symptoms, respectively. Assessments occurred via surveys administered at baseline and at the midpoint (3 weeks), postintervention (6 weeks), and follow-up (3 months and 6 months) periods. Modified intention-to-treat analyses used latent growth models. Results: Of the 219 women enrolled (mean [SD] age, 50.7 [10.8] years; 54 [26.9%] with metastatic cancer), 55 were randomized to CBT-I, 55 to BLT, 52 to CBT-I plus BLT, and 57 to SHE. A total of 208 women (95.0%) with any data at any time point were analyzed. Insomnia symptoms (ISI score mean difference [MD], -2.19 [95% CI, -3.33 to -1.05] points; P = .002) but not fatigue symptoms (PROMIS-Fatigue score MD, -0.90 [95% CI, -3.08 to 1.28] points; P = .52) improved more in the CBT-I groups compared with the non-CBT-I groups. The BLT groups (compared with the non-BLT groups) did not differ in insomnia symptoms (ISI score MD, -0.88 [95% CI, -2.02 to 0.26] points; P = .26) or fatigue symptoms (PROMIS-Fatigue score MD, -0.71 [95% CI, -2.89 to 1.47] points; P = .52). Comparable results emerged in the high-adherence subgroup and in the subgroups with high initial insomnia and fatigue symptoms. However, exploratory subgroup analyses in women with metastatic breast cancer showed that BLT (vs non-BLT) improved insomnia symptoms (ISI score MD, -2.87 [95% CI, -5.06 to -0.67] points; P = .01) and fatigue symptoms (PROMIS-Fatigue score MD, -5.16 [95% CI, -9.57 to -0.76] points; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In the SleepCARE RCT of CBT-I and BLT administered for 6 weeks to women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer, CBT-I improved insomnia but not fatigue compared with SHE or BLT. BLT did not produce greater improvements in fatigue or insomnia symptoms compared with non-BLT treatment. The study findings indicate that brief CBT-I, but not BLT, may reduce insomnia symptoms among women receiving chemotherapy for breast cancer. Trial Registration: ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12620001133921.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCognitive Behavioral TherapyPhototherapySleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersAdultAgedAustraliaFatigueFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID42658497
PMCPMC13522970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.