Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658496›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2026

A Multilevel Intervention to Identify Individuals for Genetic Testing and Treatment: The IGNITE-TX Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Kirsten A Jorgensen, Nuria Agusti, Tara Coffin, Karla Barajas, Maria D Iniesta, Erica M Bednar, Alexa Kanbergs, Roni Nitecki Wilke, Isabel Beshar, Sara Pirzadeh-Miller and 10 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05677048 (Feasibility Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05677048 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Feasibility Study: IGNITE-TX (Identifying Individuals for Genetic Testing & Treatment) Intervention

TypeinterventionalSponsorM.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRan2023 to 2027Enrolled205ConditionsGynecologic Cancer, Ovary Cancer, Pancreatic Cancer, Breast CancerArmsFree genetic testing and counseling group, IGNITE-TX Group, IGNITE-TX and free genetic testing and counseling group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Error in Byline.JAMA network open · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kirsten A JorgensenVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
Nuria AgustiDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Tara CoffinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Karla BarajasDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Maria D IniestaDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Erica M BednarDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Alexa KanbergsDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Roni Nitecki WilkeDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Isabel BesharDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Sara Pirzadeh-MillerThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Sayoni LahiriThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Kathy PrattThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Kristofer JenningsDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Heidy BoschSouth Texas Health System, Edinburg.
Charles A LeathO'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham.
Beth KarlanUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Melissa FreyWeill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Ravi SharafWeill Cornell Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian, New York, New York.
Karen LuH. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.
J Alejandro Rauh-HainDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Cascade genetic testing (CGT) is a key strategy for cancer prevention in families with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC) and Lynch syndrome (LS), yet uptake among at-risk relatives remains persistently low, particularly in medically underserved populations where structural and informational barriers limit access to genetic services. Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of IGNITE-TX (Identifying Individuals for Genetic Testing and Treatment), a scalable, bilingual, navigator-supported digital intervention designed to increase CGT uptake among at-risk relatives of individuals with HBOC or LS. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this 2 × 2 factorial pilot randomized clinical trial, probands with HBOC or LS self-enrolled online from October 1, 2023, to February 15, 2025, after recruitment through clinical, laboratory, and community pathways across the US and invited their at-risk relatives to participate. Families were cluster-randomized to 4 study arms (1:1:1:1); outcomes were assessed at 6 months. Interventions: Usual care with standard printed materials (arm 1); no-cost telegenetic counseling and testing, self-initiated by the at-risk relative (arm 2); IGNITE-TX, comprising proactive family genetic navigator support and access to a bilingual digital education and decision-support platform (arm 3); or IGNITE-TX plus no-cost telegenetic counseling and testing with navigator-assisted access (arm 4). Main Outcomes and Measures: Feasibility outcomes were enrollment and survey completion at baseline and 6 months. Secondary outcomes were CGT completion among at-risk relatives, informed decision-making, and readiness along the genetic testing pathway. Results: In this pilot randomized clinical trial, 60 probands (median age, 46.5 [range, 20-83] years; 59 female [98.3%]) and 144 at-risk relatives (median age, 39 [range, 18-87] years; 71 female [49.3%]) were enrolled. Among at-risk relatives, 99 (68.8%) reported at least 1 structural barrier to care. A total of 58 probands (97.2%) and 117 at-risk relatives (81.3%) completed the 6-month survey. Among at-risk relatives, 1 of 29 (3.4%) completed CGT in arm 1, 8 of 39 (20.5%) in arm 2, 17 of 30 (56.7%) in arm 3, and 36 of 46 (78.3%) in arm 4. Compared with non-IGNITE-TX arms, at-risk relatives in IGNITE-TX arms showed greater CGT completion (odds ratio, 26.9; 95% CI, 2.4-59.5), informed decision-making (48 of 60 [80.0%] vs 8 of 57 [14.0%]; P < .001), and readiness to pursue CGT (action stage: 53 of 61 [86.9%] vs 9 of 55 [16.4%]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this pilot randomized clinical trial, IGNITE-TX was feasible to deliver in a community-recruited cohort with structural barriers to care and was associated with higher CGT completion and improved informed decision-making and readiness compared with non-IGNITE-TX arms. These findings support further evaluation of IGNITE-TX as a scalable navigation model for equitable hereditary cancer care. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05677048.

Indexed as

Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary NonpolyposisGenetic TestingHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot Projects

Identifiers

PMID42658496
PMCPMC13522964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.