Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658492›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Identifying Patients at Risk for Psychotherapy Dropout in Community Settings.

Benjamin Giber, Abhishek Sharma, Daniel Broadie, Thomas H McCoy, Faith M Gunning, Roy H Perlis, Finale Doshi-Velez, Nili Solomonov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Benjamin GiberDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Abhishek SharmaDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel BroadieDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Thomas H McCoyDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Faith M GunningDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Roy H PerlisDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Finale Doshi-VelezSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Nili SolomonovDepartment of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Psychotherapy dropout poses a significant public health problem and is associated with depression relapse and illness persistence. Identifying who is at risk of psychotherapy dropout can guide personalized and scalable strategies to mitigate risk and improve outcomes. Objective: To estimate the prevalence and predictors of psychotherapy dropout in a large community setting. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prognostic study, electronic health record data collected between 2008 and 2022 were analyzed from 2 large academic medical centers, 6 community hospitals, and their affiliated outpatient networks in Massachusetts. Logistic regression (LR) and random forests (RF) machine learning were applied to identify predictors of dropout. Participants were individuals aged 18 to 80 years with depression who received at least 1 individual psychotherapy session. Data analysis was performed between January 2023 and March 2026. Main Outcomes and Measures: Predictors included age, self-identified race and ethnicity, medical conditions, and health care encounters. Dropout rate was assessed after 3 or fewer psychotherapy sessions. LR and RF models were trained to maximize accuracy (area under the curve [AUC]) and extracted top predictors of dropout. Results: The final cohort included 40 732 individuals (mean [SD] age, 44.2 [14.2] years; 69.3% female; 2% Asian, 8% Black, 71% White, and 18% other races; 9% Hispanic). The psychotherapy dropout rate was 28.4% (n = 11 571), with 60.9% dropping out after the first session. AUC values were 0.64 (95% CI, 0.63-0.65) for LR and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.65-0.67) for RF. Prior mental health encounters (eg, group psychotherapy [odds ratio (OR), 0.91; 95% CI, 0.90-0.91]), psychiatric evaluation (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.85-0.87), and White race (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.89-0.90) and/or non-Hispanic ethnicity (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.95-0.95) predicted decreased dropout likelihood. A mental disorder due to a physiological condition (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.04-1.05), and prior medical admission (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.03-1.04) predicted increased likelihood of dropout. Conclusions and Relevance: In this prognostic study, more than one-quarter of patients dropped out of psychotherapy, most after a single session, highlighting the need for early risk detection. Brief mental health encounters early in the health care pathway were associated with lower dropout risk, suggesting that exposure to mental health within medical settings may facilitate engagement. Electronic health record data can inform risk detection and targeted interventions in the community.

Indexed as

DepressionPatient DropoutsPsychotherapyAdultAgedFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMassachusettsMiddle AgedRandom ForestRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID42658492
PMCPMC13522969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.