ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2026
Real-World Experience with Enhanced Monofocal Intraocular Lenses Following Cataract Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Case Series.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe enVista Aspire (EA) and enVista Aspire Toric (ETA) lenses are monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) with intermediate-optimized optics designed to broaden depth of focus. This study describes outcomes with these IOLs in real-world clinical practice.
methodsThis multicenter, retrospective, real-world case series study included six cataract surgeons in the USA. Surgeons provided a convenience sample of ≥ 5 study IOL implantation cases and completed a retrospective experience survey. Outcomes included visual acuity (corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuity [CDVA, UDVA] and uncorrected intermediate visual acuity [UIVA]), refractive outcomes, and safety (adverse events and visual changes). The surgeon survey captured IOL utilization patterns and surgeon experience as supplementary descriptive findings.
resultsThe analysis included 141 eyes (88 EA and 53 ETA) from 84 patients. Patients were aged 62-84 years, with postoperative follow-up ranging from approximately Days 1-6 to 4 months. At the last available postoperative visit, monocular CDVA of 20/25 or better was achieved by 97.2% of EA and 94.9% of ETA eyes; monocular UDVA of 20/25 or better by 71.3% and 84.9%, respectively; and monocular UIVA of 20/32 or better by 76.6% and 93.0%, respectively. A binocular UIVA of 20/32 or better was achieved by 100% of patients. Mean ± SD SEQ outcome was -0.06 ± 0.30 D (EA) and 0.00 ± 0.32 D (ETA). No serious adverse events were documented in the available records. Findings from the surgeon survey indicated positive surgeon experience with the qualities and outcomes of the study IOLs.
conclusionsIn this descriptive real-world analysis, a high proportion of eyes implanted with the study IOLs achieved good distance and functional intermediate vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.