ArticleEsophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society2026
Institutional enrollment volume and clinical outcomes after surgery or chemoradiotherapy for clinical stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a supplementary analysis of JCOG0502.
Article in Esophagus : official journal of the Japan Esophageal Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSurgery and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are standard options for clinical stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). JCOG0502, a multicenter, non-randomized, parallel-group comparison, demonstrated the non-inferiority of definitive CRT compared with surgery for overall survival (OS) in patients with cT1bN0M0 ESCC; however, institutional differences may influence outcomes. This study explored inter-institutional heterogeneity in survival and adverse events (AEs) among patients in JCOG0502.
methodsAmong 379 enrolled patients, 364 were analyzed. Institutions enrolling ≥ 13 patients, corresponding to the median institutional trial enrollment, were classified as high-enrollment institutions (High), whereas those enrolling < 13 patients were classified as low-enrollment institutions (Low). Institutional trial enrollment was evaluated as an exploratory indicator, rather than as a direct measure of institutional case or procedural volume. The primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and AEs.
resultsIn the surgery group, institutional trial enrollment volume was not significantly associated with OS (HR for High vs. Low, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.40-1.35). Similarly, no significant association was observed in the CRT group (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.59-2.13). Findings for PFS were consistent with these OS results in both groups. Myocardial ischemia or infarction occurred in 5 patients in Low and none in High in the CRT group.
conclusionsNo clear association was identified between institutional trial enrollment volume and survival outcomes in either the surgery or CRT group. However, clinically meaningful differences could not be excluded. The observed differences in selected toxicities, including myocardial ischemia, should be considered hypothesis-generating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42658443What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.