ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2026
The Cultural Face of Physical, Emotional, and Social Resilience: Turkish Validation of the Essential Resilience Scale (ERS).
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to adapt The Essential Resilience Scale (ERS), which assesses resilience within the framework of anticipation, flexibility, and bounce back mechanisms and consists of three sub-dimensions: physical, emotional and social resilience, into Turkish and to evaluate its psychometric properties. The sample consists of a total of 327 participants, 267 females (81.7%) and 58 males (17.7%) between the ages of 18-70 (M = 27.08, SD = 9.73). Test-retest correlation, corrected item-total correlation and Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficients were calculated to test reliability. The construct validity of the ERS was evaluated with first-order and second-order confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). For the convergent validity, Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS), and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) was performed with the ERS. The Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficients ranged from 0.61 to 0.82, while the test-retest correlations varied between 0.64 and 0.81. Both first order and second order CFA supported the three-dimensional structure of the ERS, with acceptable-to-good fit of data. In the context of convergent validity analysis, correlation coefficients between the ERS-total resilience and the WEMWBS, BRS, and DASS-21 scales varied between - 0.24 and 0.67. As a result, the findings provide support for the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the ERS that is suitable for using in academic and clinical researches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42658430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.