ArticleInsights into imaging2026
Automated 3D chest CT muscle segmentation-derived model development and explanation in discrimination of normal, preserved ratio impaired spirometry, and COPD: a multicenter study.
Article in Insights into imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo develop and validate an automated 3D chest CT muscle segmentation model using an exploratory normalization method to discriminate normal, preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) subjects. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective study, we used TotalSegmentator to acquire 3D pectoral muscle (PM) and erector spinae muscle (ESM) volumes from chest CT, normalizing them to height and vertebral bone volume, respectively. 2D quantitative parameters were acquired and normalized. The support vector machine models were developed based on normalized 3D and 2D muscle parameters, respectively, with ten-fold cross-validation. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the discriminative performance of models, and the SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithm was used to quantify the importance of each parameter.
results1660 subjects (616 normal, 646 PRISm, 398 COPD) (median age, 66 years [IQR: 60-72 years]; 1014 males) were included and divided into training set (n = 1162), test set (n = 498). In the test set, the 3D model (macro-average AUC, 0.735; micro-average AUC, 0.733) outperformed the 2D model (macro-average AUC, 0.646; micro-average AUC, 0.665), and 3D ESM density was the most relevant muscle parameter. 3D muscle density showed a decreasing trend from normal to PRISm to COPD. In COPD, females exhibited decreased density (difference range: -14.48 to -7.79; p < 0.001), while males had a more significant decrease in volume, especially pectoralis major volume index (difference: -11.18; 95% CI -15.57, -5.08; p < 0.001).
conclusionsThe 3D muscle parameter model demonstrated higher discriminative performance than the 2D model for discriminating normal, PRISm, and COPD subjects. KEY POINTS: Question The discriminative performance of 3D CT-based muscle quantification in subjects with impaired pulmonary function remains unclear. Findings 3D muscle analysis achieved superior discrimination of normal, PRISm, and COPD subjects, with density-related parameters showing consistent group differences, particularly ESM density. Critical relevance By comparison with conventional 2D assessment, 3D CT-based muscle quantification showed better discrimination of normal, PRISm, and COPD, which might advance the personalized precision and comprehensive assessment, including muscle alteration for subjects with impaired pulmonary function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.