ArticleVeterinary research communications2026
Detection, isolation, and co-infection of parainfluenza virus 5 and porcine teschovirus 4 in colostrum-deprived piglets in Russia.
Article in Veterinary research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5) and porcine teschoviruses (PTVs) have been commonly identified during respiratory and enteric pathologies in industrial pig farming. While these viruses are widespread in pig populations of many countries, little is known about their circulation within Russian pig herds. In this study, we report the first evidence of PIV5 and PTV-4 in pigs in Russia, along with the occurrence of their co-infections. In total, 16 respiratory/oral samples obtained from colostrum-deprived piglets in 2021 on a pig farm located in Eastern Siberia were screened by qRT-PCR. Serum samples (n = 51) obtained in 2022 from this pig farm were tested using the virus neutralization assay. The PIV5 genome was identified in 75.0% of the samples, while PTV was detected in 31.3% exclusively as a co-infection with PIV5. Joint cultivation of two pathogens in a swine testis cell culture indicated that PIV5 became undetectable by the 6th passage, while the PTV Cq value remained stable from the 3rd up to the 10th passage. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the isolated strain belonged to PTV-4, and the PIV5 strain clustered exclusively with the Russian strain "Moskva," forming a divergent clade. The overall PTV-4 seroprevalence rate in tested pigs was estimated to be 70.6%. Our findings emphasize the necessity of monitoring PIV5 and PTV-4 as single and mixed infections in local pig herds to prevent diagnostic oversight and enhance infection control strategies in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42658383What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.