Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658374›Full record

ArticleChild psychiatry and human development2026

Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of the Emotion Detectives In-Out: A Blended Version of the Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders in Children.

Helena Moreira, Margarida Perdigão, Dave Skvarc, Bárbara Gomes-Pereira, Bruna Paulino, Mariana Saraiva, Brígida Caiado, Jill Ehrenreich-May, Ana Isabel Pereira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child psychiatry and human development, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Helena MoreiraUniversity of Coimbra, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3030-115, Coimbra, Portugal. hmoreira@fpce.uc.pt.
Margarida PerdigãoUniversity of Coimbra, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3030-115, Coimbra, Portugal.
Dave SkvarcSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Bárbara Gomes-PereiraUniversity of Coimbra, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3030-115, Coimbra, Portugal.
Bruna PaulinoCICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Mariana SaraivaCICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Brígida CaiadoUniversity of Coimbra, Center for Research in Neuropsychology and Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Rua Do Colégio Novo, 3030-115, Coimbra, Portugal.
Jill Ehrenreich-MayDepartment of Psychology, University of Miami, Miami, USA.
Ana Isabel PereiraCICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia PTDC/PSI-GER/0689/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent in childhood, and increasing demand for services highlights the need for scalable and accessible interventions. This pilot randomized controlled equivalence trial examined the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a blended adaptation of the Unified Protocol for Children ("Emotion Detectives In-Out"), integrating face-to-face group sessions with self-guided and therapist-supported online components. The intervention was compared with Coping Cat, a well-established cognitive-behavioral group program for childhood anxiety. Seventy-seven children aged 6-13 years with a primary anxiety disorder were randomized to either condition. Outcomes included clinician-rated severity and improvement, child- and parent-reported anxiety and depressive symptoms, and anxiety-related interference in daily life. Both interventions were associated with significant improvements over time across most outcomes. No significant between-group differences were observed for clinician-rated severity or improvement, and remission and treatment response rates were comparable. Significant group-by-time interaction effects favoring the blended intervention emerged for child-reported generalized anxiety, total anxiety and overall symptom scores. Between-group differences were limited, although Coping Cat was associated with significantly lower parent-reported family interference at post-treatment. Equivalence analyses yielded mixed findings, with some primary outcomes meeting the prespecified equivalence criteria. Findings provide preliminary evidence supporting the potential clinical utility of a blended transdiagnostic group intervention. Although several outcomes demonstrated statistical equivalence with Coping Cat, equivalence findings were mixed and should be interpreted cautiously given the pilot nature of the trial. Larger, adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether the interventions achieve clinically equivalent outcomes. Trial registration number: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/62N4X (retrospectively registered at November 18, 2025).

Indexed as

Anxiety disordersBlended interventionChildrenPilot Randomized Controlled TrialUnified Protocol for Children

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.