ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Embodied AI in the operating room: a voice-interactive robotic scrub nurse for surgical instrument handoffs.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Embodied artificial intelligence may extend surgical robotics beyond teleoperation by enabling robots to interpret natural-language commands, perceive dynamic environments, and generate adaptive physical actions. Surgical instrument exchange provides a clinically recognizable test case requiring communication, visual localization, dexterity, and bidirectional interaction. We developed a voice-interactive robotic scrub nurse through task-specific adaptation of the pretrained π0.5 vision-language-action model capable of voice-conditioned surgical instrument handoff, take-back, and spoken acknowledgment. A bimanual robotic platform was trained by fine-tuning the pretrained π0.5 model on 350 human-teleoperated demonstrations. The system integrated real-time multicamera observations, Whisper large-v2 speech recognition, language-conditioned robotic action generation, and text-to-speech acknowledgment. Performance was evaluated in 100 autonomous trials across five tasks: needle-driver handoff, forceps handoff, needle-and-suture handoff, needle-driver take-back, and forceps take-back. Each task included 10 trials using spatial configurations represented during training and 10 trials using held-out spatial configurations within the same environment. Outcomes included command interpretation, stage-wise completion, end-to-end success, completion time, and failure mode. Recovery after interference was examined qualitatively in separate representative demonstrations. The system completed 81% of trials successfully. Success was 95% for both take-back tasks, 85% for forceps handoff, 80% for needle-driver handoff, and 50% for needle-and-suture handoff. Performance decreased from 92% in seen layouts to 70% in held-out layouts. Speech-command interpretation succeeded in 99% of trials. Once a secure grasp was achieved, downstream manipulation succeeded in 81 of 82 trials. Missed grasp was the predominant failure mode. A unified learned policy enabled voice-conditioned bidirectional surgical instrument exchange and demonstrated meaningful generalization to held-out layouts within the same environment. Improved grasp acquisition, expanded instrument diversity, quantitative recovery testing, and evaluation in realistic operating-room workflows are required before clinical translation or integration with complete back-table workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42658368What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.