Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658341›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2026

Wave-driven resuspension as the dominant environmental predictor of enterococci at Chicago beaches.

Lucy Ferron, Abhilasha Shrestha, Marcia R Silva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lucy FerronIllinois Mathematics and Science Academy (IMSA), Aurora, IL, USA.
Abhilasha ShresthaSchool of Public Health, University of Illinois Chicago (UIC), Chicago, IL, USA.
Marcia R SilvaAIHealth4All, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. mqcft@umkc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) to protect public health at Chicago beaches remains a significant challenge due to complex, site-specific environmental dynamics. This study presents a machine learning pipeline utilizing site-specific random forest regressor models to predict log-transformed enterococci concentrations. The models integrate meteorological, hydrodynamic, and temporal-lag features. A hybrid evaluation framework is implemented; models are trained for regression but evaluated on their ability to classify bacterial exceedances at a 320 CCE/100 mL threshold, chosen as a conservative value given data sparsity at the Chicago Park District's Beach Action Value of 1000 CCE/100 mL, which is used to issue swim advisories at these recreational beaches. This is achieved by dynamically identifying an optimal F1 score threshold for each model's raw count predictions, linking regression performance to classification utility. Model interpretability was a primary focus, employing SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for each beach and in aggregate. This analysis provided critical insights into the distinct drivers at each location. For the Chicago beaches, the models identified hydrodynamic factors, specifically maximum wave height and maximum dominant wave period, as the most significant hydrometeorological predictors of enterococci concentrations, highlighting the importance of nearshore physical processes in this region. The resulting pipeline provides an interpretable, validated, and site-specific forecasting system capable of identifying high-risk contamination events with moderate accuracy but struggling with sensitivity.

Indexed as

Bathing BeachesEnterococcusEnvironmental MonitoringWater MicrobiologyChicagoRandom ForestWater MovementsBeach monitoringFecal indicator bacteriaHydrodynamicsLake MichiganRandom forestSHAP

Identifiers

PMID42658341
PMCPMC13522073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.