ArticleExperimental & applied acarology2026
Cell-free supernatants from entomopathogenic bacteria as a potential alternative for managing Tetranychus urticae in tomato.
Article in Experimental & applied acarology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tetranychus urticae is a cosmopolitan pest that causes significant yield losses in tomato crops. Entomopathogenic bacteria of the genera Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus produce diverse secondary metabolites with acaricidal properties. This study aimed to evaluate the acaricidal and deterrent effects of cell-free supernatants (CFSs) of Photorhabdus luminescens, Xenorhabdus szentirmaii and Xenorhabdus doucetiae against T. urticae in tomato. In Petri dishes, each CFS was sprayed onto leaflets infested with females or eggs. The deterrent activity was assessed through dual-choice bioassays. Furthermore, the acaricidal effect of these bacterial metabolites was validated under field conditions over two growing seasons. After 72 h, CFSs of P. luminescens, X. szentirmaii and X. doucetiae caused mortality rates of 80.7%, 93.5% and 85.0% in laboratory bioassays, respectively. Furthermore, egg viability was significantly reduced. In choice bioassays, the Repellency, Leaf Damage and Oviposition Indices demonstrated greater pest activity on untreated plants than on those treated with bacterial compounds. In field trials, X. szentirmaii supernatant reached a 65.4% mortality rate and significantly reduced leaf damage. Secondary metabolites produced by P. luminescens, X. szentirmaii and X. doucetiae exhibited both acaricidal and deterrent activity against T. urticae, representing a promising tool for the integrated pest management in tomato production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42658296What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.