ArticleClinical oral investigations2026
Visual distractions for pediatric patients in a dental environment using eye-tracking technology: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate visual attention patterns in anxious versus non-anxious children toward various environmental distractions in a dental clinic using eye-tracking technology and assess the impact of visual distractors on gaze behavior. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis cross-sectional study, including 121 children 6-12 years of age. Anxiety levels were determined using the Children's Fear Survey Schedule-Dental Subscale. Standardized operatory images, with and without distractors, were presented while eye-tracking metrics were recorded. Heatmaps were generated and group comparisons were performed using non-parametric tests.
resultsNearly one-half (49.6%) of participants were classified as anxious who, in the absence of distractors, exhibited faster entry times and longer dwell times on dental instruments and handpieces than their non-anxious counterparts (p < 0.001). Introduction of distractors significantly redirected gaze toward child-friendly elements, altered fixation sequences, and reduced revisits to clinical tools. Children in both groups consistently focused on clinicians' eyes, with decorated masks attracting further attention.
conclusionAnxious children demonstrated distinct gaze patterns compared with their non-anxious peers, exhibiting faster orienting and altered engagement with dental instruments. Introduction of visual distractors significantly redirected attention toward child-friendly elements and away from anxiety-provoking stimuli, emphasizing the influence of anxiety on visual focus and the effectiveness of environmental modifications in improving the pediatric dental experience. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study contributes to the design of anxiety-reducing pediatric dental environments by identifying elements that attract the visual attention of children. The presence of appropriate distractors within the pediatric dental clinic may help redirect children's gaze away from clinical tools and instruments. These findings can inform the design and layout of pediatric dental clinics to enhance comfort and patient cooperation, ultimately improving the overall quality of pediatric dental care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.