Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658240›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026

Machine learning-based screening model for osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women: a nationwide study with prospective fracture validation.

Qichao Sun, Xiangjun Yin, Wei Yu, Nan Zhao, Lin Chen, Shunyu Tang, Hua Lin, Lu Cui, Xiaolan Jin, Zhongjian Xie and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Qichao Sun *Department of Endocrinology, NHC Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xiangjun Yin *Division of Elderly Health, National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Wei YuDepartment of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Nan ZhaoMedical Sciences Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Lin ChenDepartment of Wound Repair and Rehabilitation Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Trauma, Burns and Combined Injury, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shunyu TangDivision of Elderly Health, National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Hua LinDepartment of Orthopaedics, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
Lu CuiDivision of Elderly Health, National Center for Chronic and Noncommunicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Xiaolan JinDepartment of Endocrinology, Chengdu Military General Hospital, Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.
Zhongjian XieHunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Metabolic Bone Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Metabolic Diseases, Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Hunan Province, Changsha, China.
Steven R CummingsSan Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Zhixin LiNational Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Linhong WangNational Center for Chronic and Non-Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China.
Lijia CuiDepartment of Endocrinology, NHC Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. celiaclj@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9929-340X
Weibo XiaDepartment of Endocrinology, NHC Key Laboratory of Endocrinology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. xiaweibo8301@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7768-5536

Funding

Beijing Natural Science Foundation 7252109Chinese Central Government Key Project of Public Health Program grant [2018]8Chinese Red Cross Foundation, National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-D-006National Key R&D Program of China 2021YFC2501700the Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences 2023-PT320-10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study develops a machine learning model to predict osteoporosis in Chinese postmenopausal women. The model was trained using the largest nationwide cohort and externally validated. It showed AUCs of 0.744-0.798 and demonstrated prognostic value for 5-year fracture risk, supporting population-level screening where DXA resources are limited. PURPOSE: Osteoporosis is highly prevalent among Chinese postmenopausal women, yet underdiagnosis remains due to limited DXA availability. We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based model for osteoporosis prediction using easily obtainable variables.

methodsThe model was trained using data from the largest nationwide cohort (China Osteoporosis Prevalence Study, n = 6,574) and externally validated in two independent cohorts: the China Vertebral and Osteoporosis Study (n = 1,758) and the Peking Vertebral Fracture Study baseline (n = 1,439). Five predictors selected via LASSO regression were used to train the prediction model. Model performance was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) and calibration plot. To evaluate its ability to predict future fractures, the model was evaluated in a 5-year follow-up cohort (n = 795). A web-based calculator was developed for public use.

resultsThe model showed strong discrimination (AUC: 0.798 in the training cohort; 0.775 in the internal validation cohort; 0.750 and 0.744 in the external validation cohorts) and good calibration across all cohorts. A rule-out threshold (≥ 0.098) demonstrated high sensitivity (94.7%, 89.3%) and negative predictive value (91.3%, 92.7%) in two external cohorts. The model also demonstrated prognostic value for fracture risk stratification. In the 5-year follow-up, individuals classified as high risk had a significantly higher cumulative incidence of clinical fractures (HR 1.78; 95% CI, 1.06-2.99; P = 0.026), as well as higher rates of all fractures (15.9% vs. 9.5%; P = 0.015) and non-traumatic fractures (7.8% vs. 3.9%; P = 0.041).

conclusionsThis model demonstrated good performance in predicting osteoporosis among Chinese postmenopausal women and may facilitate two-step screening strategies.

Indexed as

Machine learningOsteoporosisPostmenopauseScreening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.