ReviewPediatric cardiology2026
Measuring What Matters: Defining Compassion in Pediatric Cardiology.
Review in Pediatric cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Compassion is widely endorsed within healthcare but remains inconsistently defined, variably operationalized, and rarely measured within pediatric cardiology. Contemporary quality systems evaluate mortality, procedural outcomes, complications, and patient experience, but seldom assess relational dimensions of care that may shape family experience and trust. Pediatric cardiology presents a distinctive context: uncertainty may persist across years, high-stakes decisions are frequently made by parents or guardians on behalf of a child, and therapeutic relationships may extend from fetal diagnosis through adulthood. This paper proposes a clinically grounded framework for defining and operationalizing compassion within pediatric cardiology. We define clinical compassion as the intentional recognition of emotional, existential, and clinical vulnerability in children and families, accompanied by relational and behavioral actions aimed at reducing distress, preserving dignity, supporting shared decision-making, and sustaining trust across longitudinal care. Building on existing pediatric compassion and family-centered care literature, we propose six observable domains: recognition of vulnerability, communication under uncertainty, relational presence, shared decision engagement, follow-through and continuity, and humility in action. These domains translate compassion from an abstract value into clinically recognizable behaviors while acknowledging overlap with established dimensions of relational care. We further propose a prototype measurement architecture integrating observed behavioral assessment, child- and parent-reported experience where developmentally appropriate, and clinician reflective practice. The framework is conceptual rather than validated and is intended to support qualitative refinement, multidisciplinary consensus, instrument development, and psychometric evaluation. Compassion should be regarded as an important dimension of clinical practice warranting rigorous definition, evaluation, teaching, and continuous improvement within pediatric cardiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42658231What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.