Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658220›Full record

ReviewVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2026

Liquid biopsy in solid tumours: expert opinion paper of the European society of pathology.

Nicola Fusco, Xavier Matias-Guiu, Irene Esposito, Raed Al Dieri, Aleš Ryška, Paul Hofman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nicola FuscoDivision of Pathology and Somatic Molecular Diagnostics, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Xavier Matias-GuiuEuropean Society of Pathology, Brussels, Belgium.
Irene EspositoEuropean Society of Pathology, Brussels, Belgium.
Raed Al DieriEuropean Society of Pathology, Brussels, Belgium.
Aleš RyškaEuropean Society of Pathology, Brussels, Belgium. ales.ryska@fnhk.cz.
Paul HofmanIHU RespirERA, Côte d'Azur University, 30 Avenue de la Voie Romaine, Nice Cedex 01, 06002, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy (LBx), particularly plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) analysis, has become an important use case of molecular pathology in solid tumours. While tissue remains the cornerstone of diagnosis, ctDNA testing provides a minimally invasive alternative using repeatable source of tumour-derived genomic information that complements tissue analysis when samples are unavailable, insufficient, outdated, or unlikely to capture tumour heterogeneity and evolution. In this expert opinion paper, the European Society of Pathology (ESP) defines its vision for LBx implementation across Europe and reaffirms the central role of pathology in blood-based detection of genomic alterations in solid tumours. Two clinical models highlight current implementation of LBx into standard diagnostic work-up. In advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), LBx enables rapid detection of actionable somatic genomic alterations, supports treatment decisions when tissue biopsy is not available/sufficient for molecular analysis, and identifies acquired resistance genomic alterations at progression. However, tissue remains essential for histological classification, PD-L1 assessment, recognition of histologic transformation, evaluation of tumour microenvironment, and molecular testing when comprehensive genomic profiling or confirmation of liquid biopsy findings is required. In metastatic breast cancer, LBx has become central to dynamic molecular management of patients with originally hormonally dependent disease. This paper also addresses key technical and interpretative challenges, including assay selection, next-generation sequencing, clonal haematopoiesis, tumour fraction, variant allele fraction, co-mutations, testing logistics, and quality assurance. Given heterogeneity in access to LBx testing across Europe, harmonized standards for validation, reporting, training, and equitable availability are urgently needed. Pathology laboratories have a central role in identifying somatic alterations in cancer tissue, and LBx is an obvious extension of this important task. An integrated morphological-molecular pathology assessment is needed to implement appropriate precision oncology strategies. Incorporation of specific professional personal profiles (molecular biologists, bioinformaticians) to pathology laboratories is therefore essential for such optimal approach.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBreast cancerctDNALiquid biopsyLung cancerMolecular pathologyPrecision oncology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.