ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2026
Ineffectual Genomic Error Correction Under Environmental Perturbation Dynamically Regulates Mutational Supply and Robustness.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adaptation requires an adequate supply of heritable variation, yet too much mutation can limit organismal viability by disrupting essential molecular functions. Our study shows that this trade-off arises inherently from the kinetic proofreading mechanism that dictates the replication fidelity. In our model, environmental shifts alter the optimal driving rate constant of proofreading enzymes, transiently elevating replication error rates and triggering rapid evolutionary change until a new fidelity optimum is reached. This produces alternating periods of stasis and rapid adaptation, the central signature of punctuated equilibrium. We further show that coding-region length and population size jointly determine whether adaptation succeeds or mutational collapse occurs, reflecting the balance between mutation supply and error tolerance. The resulting limit on mutation rates is qualitatively consistent with predictions of the drift-barrier hypothesis. Therefore, evolution is shown to select a mutation rate that supports evolutionary adaptation while avoiding genomic meltdown.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42658218What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.