Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42658030›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2026

Forest Kernel Balancing Weights: Outcome-Guided Features for Causal Inference.

Andy A Shen, Eli Ben-Michael, Avi Feller, Luke Keele, Jared Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andy A ShenUniversity of California, Berkeley, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2203-3375
Eli Ben-MichaelCarnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1175-4129
Avi FellerUniversity of California, Berkeley, California, USA.
Luke KeeleUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3859-2713
Jared MurrayUniversity of Texas, Austin, Texas, USA.

Funding

Institute of Education Sciences R305D210014Institute of Education Sciences R305D240036National Science Foundation 2146752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While balancing covariates between groups is central for observational causal inference, selecting which features to balance remains a challenging problem. Kernel balancing is a promising approach that first estimates a kernel that captures similarity across units and then balances a (possibly low-dimensional) summary of that kernel, indirectly learning important features to balance. In this paper, we propose forest kernel balancing, which leverages the underappreciated fact that tree-based machine learning models, namely random forests and Bayesian additive regression trees (BART), implicitly estimate a kernel based on the co-occurrence of observations in the same terminal leaf node. Thus, even though the resulting kernel is solely a function of baseline features, the selected nonlinearities and other interactions are important for predicting the outcome-and therefore are important for addressing confounding. Through simulations and applied illustrations, we show that forest kernel balancing leads to meaningful computational and statistical improvement relative to standard kernel methods, which do not incorporate outcome information when learning features.

Indexed as

CausalityMachine LearningModels, StatisticalBayes TheoremComputer SimulationHumansObservational Studies as TopicRandom Forestbalancing weightscausal inferenceinverse probability weightingobservational studiesweighting

Identifiers

PMID42658030
PMCPMC13520828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.