Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42657965›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2026

Comparison of Healthcare Utilization Before Diagnosis Between Non-Advanced and Advanced Lung Cancer Patients: A Study Among 72,851 Cases in Germany.

Josephine Küsel-Kanbach, Oliver Riedel, Ulrike Haug

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josephine Küsel-KanbachDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6580-6682
Oliver RiedelDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1721-502X
Ulrike HaugDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1886-2923

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is no study from Germany on the association between stage of lung cancer (LC) and patient characteristics. We aimed to compare advanced versus non-advanced LC cases regarding indicators of healthcare utilization. Using claims data covering 20% of the German population, we included LC patients diagnosed between 2013 and 2019. Stratified by stage (advanced vs. non-advanced), we assessed comorbidities, hospitalizations, outpatient physician contacts and utilization of preventive measures before LC diagnosis. Among 72,851 included LC patients, 29% (females) and 28% (males) were classified as non-advanced. For all comorbidities considered and for most other indicators, an inverse association with stage was observed. For example, in males with non-advanced versus advanced LC, the proportions with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were 37% and 27% (females: 38% vs. 29%), and the proportions with ≥ 1 hospitalization in the 3 years prior LC diagnosis were 70% versus 58% (females: 69% vs. 55%). In conclusion, LC patients with more frequent healthcare utilization before LC diagnosis were more likely to be diagnosed at a non-advanced stage. Regarding future LC screening, the findings underline the importance of developing implementation strategies that ensure the reach of those who use health services less frequently, as these individuals are at higher risk of being diagnosed at an advanced stage if they develop LC.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPatient Acceptance of Health CareAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleGermanyHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Stagingcomorbiditylung cancerstageutilization of healthcare system

Identifiers

PMID42657965
PMCPMC13637057

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.