ReviewInternational wound journal2026
The Identification of Risk Factors in the Development of Wound Healing Complications in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients.
Review in International wound journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wound-healing complications (WHCs) remain a significant challenge in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) surgery, contributing to increased morbidity, prolonged hospitalisation, and impaired functional outcomes. This study aimed to identify predictors of WHC development in STS patients to improve therapeutic strategies and patient recovery. We conducted a single-institution, retrospective analysis of 318 STS patients treated between April 2019 and June 2021. Variables assessed included demographic data, tumour characteristics, treatment modalities, surgical interventions, and follow-up outcomes. Statistical analyses used chi-square tests, Kaplan-Meier estimates, and multivariate regression. WHCs occurred in 30.8% of patients. Significant negative predictors included high tumour grade (p = 0.018), presence of metastasis (p < 0.001), bone tissue resection (p = 0.005), number of revision procedures (p < 0.001), secondary wound closure (p < 0.001), and tumour relapse frequency (p = 0.012). WHCs were also associated with increased risk of death (p = 0.004) and longer initial hospitalisation (p < 0.001). Chemotherapy showed a protective effect when stratified by tumour grade. Patients with high-grade tumours and multiple surgical interventions represent a high-risk group for WHC development. These findings highlight the importance of ongoing treatment reevaluation and suggest that chemotherapy may offer beneficial outcomes in selected cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.