Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42657924›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council2026

Stress Processes and Resilience Pathways of Sexually and Gender Diverse Communities: A Narrative Review of 15 Years of Evolving Research Priorities and Practices.

Robert-Paul Juster

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Robert-Paul JusterDepartment of Psychiatry and Addiction, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-4042

Funding

Fondation de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de MontréalFonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé Jr1-269532Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé Jr 2-332273
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexually and gender diverse (SGD) people in North America have navigated significant sociopolitical shifts that continue to shape their lived experiences. Given the persistent exposure to stigma, SGD communities are disproportionately vulnerable to stress-related health disparities. While sexual and gender minority stress models highlight the detrimental impact of stigma, research also emphasizes the role of protective factors and resilience pathways in mitigating these effects. This narrative review of my research program over the last 15 years explores stress physiology as a potential mechanism linking stigma to long-term health and wellness trajectories among SGD populations. Through a selection of key findings and that of my collaborators, I discuss the physiological underpinnings of stress adaptation among SGD people and our evolving research approaches in partnership with the community. Specifically, my work examines allostatic load, a measure of cumulative physiological "wear and tear" resulting from chronic stress. While our initial work focused on the impacts of marginalization, this work increasingly highlights the strengths and adaptive capacities within SGD communities. By bridging stress physiology with resilience frameworks, we aim to inform interventions that promote health equity and well-being for SGD communities worldwide.

Indexed as

Resilience, PsychologicalSexual and Gender MinoritiesStress, PsychologicalAllostasisHumansSocial Stigmaallostatic loadcortisolgender identityresiliencesexual and gender minority stresssexual orientationstress physiology

Identifiers

PMID42657924
PMCPMC13520818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.