The Future of Cardiovascular Subspecialty Training.

Dipanjan Banerjee, Eva Meunier, Urooj Fatima, Pritha Subramanyan, Peter Ermis, Zain Ul Abideen Asad, Benjamin H Freed

Abstract readReview

In one paragraph

Review in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dipanjan BanerjeeDepartment of Medicine, The John A Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai'i and Kuakini Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA. Electronic address: dipanjan@hawaii.edu.

Eva MeunierDepartment of Medical Education, St. Joseph Hospital, Covenant Health, Nashua, New Hampshire, USA.

Urooj FatimaDivision of Cardiology, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA.

Pritha SubramanyanDivision of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

Peter ErmisDivision of Cardiology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.

Zain Ul Abideen AsadDivision of Cardiology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA.

Benjamin H FreedDivision of Cardiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular (CV) medicine as a field has expanded rapidly, and that expansion has led to the proliferation of CV subspecialties beyond the initial cohort of interventional cardiology and electrophysiology. The rapid pace of growth of CV subspecialties, coupled with a growing mismatch between the supply and demand of practicing subspecialists, has exposed deficiencies in the current model of CV subspecialty training. These deficiencies include excessive length of training, lack of flexibility in training, and lack of standardization. In this manuscript, we review the current model of CV subspecialty training, current efforts in place to redefine that training, and propose new training models that can positively transform CV subspecialty training to meet the needs of trainees, training programs, health care institutions, and patients.

Indexed as

academic innovationcardiovascular subspecialtygraduate medical education

Identifiers

PMID42657853

DOI10.1016/j.jacadv.2026.103055

PMCPMC13531623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.