ArticleGlobal change biology2026
Spatial Decomposition of Eddy Covariance Fluxes: The FLUGS Framework.
Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Spatial Decomposition of Eddy Covariance Fluxes: The FLUGS Framework.Global change biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how heterogeneous landscapes contribute to ecosystem-exchange fluxes remains a significant challenge for utilizing eddy covariance (EC) measurements. This work presents FLUGS, a novel framework that infers land-cover-specific ecosystem-exchange fluxes provided the EC time series of aggregated fluxes and the land cover map of the ecosystem. Using a multitask machine learning approach based on Kernel Ridge Regression combined with high-resolution flux footprints, FLUGS learns the environmental response functions (ERFs) from EC data for each land cover class simultaneously. FLUGS integrates a state-of-the-art atmospheric transport model that provides accurate, computationally efficient footprint estimates with a statistically rigorous, convex optimization method for submeso-scale flux inversion. The approach is versatile, robust to multicollinearity and yields smooth and interpretable ERFs with a unique global optimum. We evaluate FLUGS using virtual and physical experiments derived from synthetic data and observational data from an EC site in Northeast Siberia. Across all tests, the framework accurately reconstructs land-cover-specific sensible heat and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.