Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42657677›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2026

Spatial Decomposition of Eddy Covariance Fluxes: The FLUGS Framework.

Mark Schlutow, Ray Chew, Mathias Göckede

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark SchlutowDepartment Biogeochemical Signals, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Thuringia, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3640-634X
Ray ChewDivision of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6454-8401
Mathias GöckedeDepartment Biogeochemical Signals, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Thuringia, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2833-8401

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 235221301H2020 European Research Council 951288
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how heterogeneous landscapes contribute to ecosystem-exchange fluxes remains a significant challenge for utilizing eddy covariance (EC) measurements. This work presents FLUGS, a novel framework that infers land-cover-specific ecosystem-exchange fluxes provided the EC time series of aggregated fluxes and the land cover map of the ecosystem. Using a multitask machine learning approach based on Kernel Ridge Regression combined with high-resolution flux footprints, FLUGS learns the environmental response functions (ERFs) from EC data for each land cover class simultaneously. FLUGS integrates a state-of-the-art atmospheric transport model that provides accurate, computationally efficient footprint estimates with a statistically rigorous, convex optimization method for submeso-scale flux inversion. The approach is versatile, robust to multicollinearity and yields smooth and interpretable ERFs with a unique global optimum. We evaluate FLUGS using virtual and physical experiments derived from synthetic data and observational data from an EC site in Northeast Siberia. Across all tests, the framework accurately reconstructs land-cover-specific sensible heat and

Indexed as

EcosystemEnvironmental MonitoringModels, TheoreticalCarbon DioxideCarbon DioxideEddy covarianceenvironmental response functionsflux spatializationfootprint modelingrepresentativenessspatial flux decompositionspatial heterogeneityupscaling

Identifiers

PMID42657677
PMCPMC13520133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.