Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42657627›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2026

Morphometric Explanations for Deep Learning Based Neuroimaging Classifiers.

Ankush Gajanan Arudkar, Bernard J E Evans, Sabrina Sghirripa, Mark Jenkinson, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ankush Gajanan ArudkarAdelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3417-7878
Bernard J E EvansAdelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3517-3775
Sabrina SghirripaAdelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0275-1476
Mark JenkinsonAdelaide University, Adelaide, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-0166
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Funding

Project 1U19AG024904 · NIA · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE/RES/EDU · PI Duygu Tosun-Turgut · 2016 to 2026
$226.7M
Smartphone-Based "Burst" Cognitive AssessmentsP01AG003991 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOHN MORRIS · 1985 to 2026
$69.5M
WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ALZHEIMERS DISEASE RESEARCH CENTERP50AG005681 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 1985 to 2019
$52.1M
The natural history of AB accumulation in preclinical ADP01AG026276 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MORRIS, JOHN · 2005 to 2025
$49.5M
MORPHOMETRY BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS RESEARCH NETWORKU24RR021382 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI ROSEN, BRUCE R · 2004 to 2008
$24.1M
STRUCTURE, FUNCTION AND COGNITION IN SCHIZOPHRENIAP50MH071616 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BARCH, DEANNA · 2004 to 2008
$11.2M
Functional-anatomic exploration of cognitive controlR01AG021910 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BUCKNER, RANDY L · 2005 to 2009
$1.2M
Adelaide UniversityNCRR NIH HHS U24 RR021382NIA NIH HHS P01 AG003991NIA NIH HHS P01 AG026276NIA NIH HHS P50 AG005681NIA NIH HHS R01 AG021910NIA NIH HHS U19 AG024904NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH071616
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite increasing accuracy of deep-learning-based medical imaging classifiers for detecting complex neurodegenerative disorders, an inherent lack of transparency and interpretability in their decisions poses a challenge to their clinical and research applications. While existing explainability methods provide insights into broader aspects of a classification decision, they do not provide a direct interpretation of how specific image information was used for a classification. Geometric, or morphological, brain changes are known to exist in multiple neurodegenerative disorders, and explaining how these changes are being used by a classifier would provide domain experts with an easily interpretable understanding of morphology contributing towards the classification decision. Our work proposes a counterfactual method to explain morphological features used by deep-learning classifiers for classifying image instances. Furthermore, to provide a more interpretable understanding of common morphological features used by a classifier for the population, we combine the instance explanations to describe average morphological brain changes used by the classifier in MNI152 space. The proposed method was tested using classifiers trained for detecting Parkinson's Disease (PD) and a simulated disease in T1-w MRIs. The counterfactual images generated by our method were shown to explain learnt disease-related image information, as the classification of more than 98% of images for the PD classifier was changed by modifying the explained aspects of the image morphology. By deriving geometric explanations used by deep-learning classifiers, future research can advance trustworthiness by validating the classifiers against existing disease knowledge and potentially harness them to explore novel disease processes. Our code is available at: https://github.com/ankusharudkar/Morphometric-Explanations.

Indexed as

BrainDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingParkinson DiseaseClassification AlgorithmsHumanscounterfactual explanationexplainable artificial intelligencemagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID42657627
PMCPMC13519960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.