Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42657621›Full record

ArticlePediatric transplantation2026

Impact of Donor Age on Short-Term Outcomes After Pediatric Split Liver Transplantation.

Dongwei Wu, Jianfeng Zhang, Kaining Zeng, Xiao Feng, Qing Yang, Jia Yao, Binsheng Fu, Yang Yang, Hui Tang, Shuhong Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dongwei WuOrgan Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4484-6343
Jianfeng ZhangOrgan Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Kaining ZengOrgan Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao FengOrgan Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Qing YangOrgan Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jia YaoOrgan Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1457-7241
Binsheng FuOrgan Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6900-2934
Yang YangOrgan Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Hui TangOrgan Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2991-7966
Shuhong YiOrgan Transplantation Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1837-7837

Funding

the Guangzhou Regional Clinical High-level, Major and Characteristic Technology Program (2026-2028) 2026P-GX007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSplit liver transplantation (SLT) expands access to grafts for pediatric recipients, but the short-term implications of donor age at the extremes of the accepted range remain uncertain.

methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 144 pediatric SLT recipients treated from 2015 to 2025. Recipients were grouped by donor age: 2-10 years (n = 21), 11-49 years (n = 103), and 50-63 years (n = 20). One-year patient and death-censored graft survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Donor age was additionally modeled continuously per 10-year increase in separate Cox models for death-censored graft loss and patient death. The functional form of donor age for graft loss was examined using restricted cubic splines, and outcomes were explored by in situ versus ex situ splitting.

resultsOne-year patient survival was 90.5%, 91.2%, and 84.4% in Groups A, B, and C, respectively (log-rank p = 0.711); corresponding death-censored graft survival was 95.2%, 94.0%, and 84.1% (p = 0.334). Per 10-year increase in donor age, the hazard ratio was 1.217 (95% CI, 0.823-1.800; p = 0.324) for graft loss and 1.099 (95% CI, 0.796-1.516; p = 0.568) for patient death. No significant departure from linearity was detected (p for nonlinearity = 0.527). In situ and ex situ splitting showed no significant differences in 1-year survival after adjustment for donor age.

conclusionsOne-year survival did not differ significantly by donor age. Carefully selected young and older donors may be considered in experienced centers, although limited sample sizes and wide confidence intervals warrant caution.

Indexed as

Liver TransplantationTissue DonorsAdolescentAdultAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleGraft SurvivalHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung Adultdonor agegraft survivalpediatric split liver transplantationportal vein thrombosisshort‐term outcomes

Identifiers

PMID42657621
PMCPMC13519970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.