SynthesisDrug delivery2026
Analyzing the impact of subcutaneous injection needle, device, and administration characteristics on patient pain, anxiety, and safety: a systematic literature review.
Synthesis in Drug delivery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The subcutaneous (SC) injection route is a commonly used and important method for therapeutic delivery of a wide range of compounds, and needle characteristics have a significant influence on patient pain, anxiety, safety, and other outcomes. This systematic review evaluates the evidence on how needle-specific characteristics (e.g. gauge, length, tip design, wall thickness, concealment) and administration- or device-related factors can affect patient-reported outcomes and clinical safety indicators during and following SC injections. A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov in June 2024. Studies were included if they assessed the relationship between needle characteristics and pain, anxiety, safety, or related outcomes in individuals receiving SC injections. A dual-reviewer process was used for study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment. Sixty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Evidence consistently indicated that thinner and shorter needles reduced patient-reported pain and adverse events such as bruising and bleeding. Tapered and lubricated needles, hidden or retractable needle designs, and use of autoinjectors or prefilled syringes also contributed to reduced anxiety and improved user satisfaction. However, results were heterogeneous, and many studies lacked sufficient power or single-variable evaluation of individual needle parameters, limiting definitive conclusions. Needle characteristics significantly influence patient experience and safety with SC delivery. While both clinical evidence and practical experience clearly favor thinner, shorter, and concealed needles, further standardized, high-quality research is needed to isolate and quantify the specific contributions of individual needle characteristics to optimize injection practices and support patient-centered device design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.