ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2026
Greenland sharks conform to expectations of neutral buoyancy but exhibit inter-individual variation.
Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Buoyancy is an omnipresent force that governs how aquatic animals move through three-dimensional space, leading to physiological and behavioural adaptions across species. Swimming effort during vertical movements is increasingly being used to infer buoyancy in animals that exhibit oscillatory diving behaviours and for which collecting direct measurements of buoyancy is infeasible. Here, we estimated the relative buoyancy of 29 Greenland sharks (Somniosus microcephalus) tagged with biologgers by comparing swimming effort [overall dynamic body acceleration (ODBA)/speed] during ascending and descending dives, and accounting for dive geometry. We found that buoyancy in Greenland sharks varied on both sides of the spectrum, with effort in the counter-buoyancy direction reaching as high as 225% of the effort exerted in the buoyancy-aided direction in negatively buoyant individuals, and up to 177% for positively buoyant individuals. Despite this, there was no overall bias towards positive or negative buoyancy for this species, supporting the expectation that slow-moving deep-sea species face selective pressure towards neutral buoyancy. Given that gliding behaviour was rare and that small deviations from neutral buoyancy could drive large differences in effort for a minimally active species, more research is needed to determine the exact magnitude of the buoyancy variation observed here. Even so, its impact on swimming efficiency probably regulates movement and foraging strategies, as sharks are forced to either cope with, or exploit, their tendency to sink or float. These findings also highlight the need for studies directly linking biologger-inferred buoyancy to true buoyancy, with implications for the study of body condition in sharks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.