Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42657434›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

AmpliPhy improves gene trees by adding homologous sequences without affecting alignments.

Dongwook Kim, Manuel Gil, Kazutaka Katoh, Christophe Dessimoz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dongwook KimDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7386-3163
Manuel GilSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7089-6285
Kazutaka KatohDepartment of Genome Informatics, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-8393
Christophe DessimozDepartment of Computational Biology, University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2170-853X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: In phylogenomics, gene tree reconstruction depends on multiple sequence alignment and tree inference, and ongoing work continues to improve inference quality. Denser taxon sampling has been associated with improved gene tree inference, suggesting that adding homologs could be a practical route to higher accuracy as sequence databases continue to expand. However, adding sequences can influence multiple steps of typical inference pipelines, and little is known on its specific effect on the multiple sequence alignment, tree reconstruction, and rooting steps. Results: We performed a large-scale empirical and simulated benchmarks to quantify how homolog enrichment affects alignment and phylogenetic inference. Using an enrichment-impoverishment design and a measure of tree accuracy based on taxonomic congruence, we found that enrichment consistently improves tree inference quality, while effects on alignment quality are marginal. We show that this improvement is associated with, but not restricted to accurate root placement on enriched trees when sensitive homolog search is accompanied. Notably, much of the benefit can be retained with relatively compact alignments produced by sequence addition. Building on these observations, we provide a tool, AmpliPhy, which efficiently improves phylogenetic reconstruction of protein families through homolog enrichment. Availability and Implementation: The AmpliPhy open-source pipeline software is available at https://github.com/DessimozLab/ampliphy. The scripts used to generate the data and figures are available from https://github.com/DessimozLab/ampliphy-analysis.

Identifiers

PMID42657434
PMCPMC13516908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.