Phytoplankton community responses to sub-inhibitory levels of four contaminants of emerging concern.

Catherine Schlenker, Gavin Madgett, Henry Guy, Tammi L Richardson, Eilea Knotts, James L Pinckney

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plankton research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Catherine SchlenkerDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, 715 Sumter St, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5249-644X

Gavin MadgettSchool of the Earth, Ocean, and Environment Marine Science Program, University of South Carolina, 701 Sumter St, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

Henry GuySchool of the Earth, Ocean, and Environment Marine Science Program, University of South Carolina, 701 Sumter St, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

Tammi L RichardsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, 715 Sumter St, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0667-3455

Eilea KnottsDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, 715 Sumter St, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

James L PinckneyDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of South Carolina, 715 Sumter St, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6056-6511

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) are increasingly prevalent in freshwater systems, yet their effects on phytoplankton communities remain poorly understood. We examine how a representative freshwater assemblage responds to four ubiquitous CECs [carbamazepine, diclofenac, 1H,1H,2H,2H-perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (6:2 FTS) and 6ppd-quinone (6PPD-Q)] at environmentally relevant concentrations, monitoring changes in chlorophyll

Indexed as

aquaticBayesianbreakpointChemtaxphytoplankton

Identifiers

PMID42657420

DOI10.1093/plankt/fbag072

PMCPMC13518054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.