ArticleFrontiers in genetics2026
Sex-dependent prediction of autism.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have a global prevalence of 1%, with a male-to- female diagnosis ratio of roughly 4:1. Several models have been developed to predict ASD using genetic information. However, the influence of biological sex on prediction outcomes remains underexplored. Methods: We present an ensemble model to predict ASD, which integrates polygenic risk scores (PRSs), common genetic variants, and ASD risk genes with the MSSNG whole genome sequencing (WGS) dataset. Results: Following training, our model achieved an accuracy of 0.68, an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.72, and a recall of 0.77 on the test dataset. Notably, common variants contributed more significantly to ASD prediction in males than females (p < 0.001), with accuracies of 0.69 and 0.66, respectively. The 16p11 locus emerged as particularly predictive for females (p < 0.001). Gene enrichment analysis using the Allen Brain Atlas revealed that expression of ASD risk genes that were significant in females were enriched (FWER < 0.05) in the primary somatosensory cortex, inferior parietal cortex, and parietal neocortex during fetal development. By contrast, male ASD risk gene expression was enriched (FWER < 0.05) in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex across developmental stages (fetal to adult). Discussion: These findings underscore a sex-dependent role for common genetic variants in the risk of developing ASD. In doing so, they highlight the utility of ensemble models that incorporate common variation and biological sex for ASD prediction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.