ArticleJPRAS open2026
Perceived inequalities and cultural inclusivity in UK Breast Cancer Information and Care: a mixed method study.
Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: This study evaluates inequalities in National Health Service (NHS) breast cancer (BC) information, with a focus on equity and inclusivity. Drawing on the perspectives of UK medical students and resident doctors, the study explores perceived gaps in resources, supporting the development of inclusive materials that serve our diverse patient populations. Methods: A survey was distributed to gather insights into perceived gaps in education and resources. Following this, a comprehensive review of NHS BC leaflets was carried out, evaluating their inclusivity and representation. Based on these findings, an inclusive leaflet was designed; the leaflet's readability was improved through a large language model. Results: A total of 1555 survey responses were collected; 60.3% (n=938) were medical students and 39.7% (n=617) were resident doctors. 85.5% (n=1330) of respondents denied attending breast-related cultural sensitivity training, and 64.7% (n=1006) felt inadequately equipped to address breast concerns in patients from diverse backgrounds.The mean readability across NHS leaflets showed a readability age of 14-15 years. 15.9% (n=38) of resources being available in languages other than English (p=0.0012). While 27.6% (n=66) of the 239 NHS trusts had BC leaflets available, none was fully inclusiveThese insights directly informed the design of a new leaflet to address identified gaps, focusing on inclusivity and readability. The clinician developed, LLM assisted leaflet met ages 12-13, closer to national recommended levels of 9-11. (FRES +7.72; FKGL -1.96; GFI -2.24; SMOG -1.4; CLI -0.39). Conclusions: Inequalities and lack of representation are seen at a national level within BC NHS patient materials. These inequalities are similarly perceived by students and resident doctors. This can have a negative impact on patient experience and journey through a BC diagnosis. Further work is necessary to improve the quality of information given to BC patients, with gaps bridged through inclusive resources and adequate preparation in BC counselling. For this purpose, the leaflet proposed in this paper represents a prototype that may inform the design of future studies and the development of more inclusive patient information resources, in line with NHS priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.