ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Heterogeneity in psychological wellbeing within the university community: a latent profile analysis of wellbeing profiles and associated factors.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Psychological wellbeing in university settings is a multidimensional construct shaped by individual, occupational, and structural factors that vary across members of the academic community. This study aimed to identify and compare psychological wellbeing profiles among students, Academic and Research Staff (ARS), and Technical, Administrative, and Services Staff (TASS), and to examine the main determinants associated with these profiles. The final sample consisted of 742 participants. In this exploratory study, an unsupervised latent profile analysis was applied to identify wellbeing typologies within each group, and the quality of the solution was evaluated using cohesion, separation, and parsimony indices. In addition, nonparametric tests and logistic regression analysis were conducted to validate profile differentiation and to examine the influence of psychological, sociodemographic, and structural factors on profile membership. The results revealed two distinct profiles of psychological wellbeing (low vs. high) across all three groups, with statistically significant differences across all assessed dimensions (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.