Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42657261›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Consanguinity-Associated Genetic Disorders in Saudi Arabia: A Hypothesis on the Future Role of CRISPR-Based Gene Editing.

Dana Aldughim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Dana AldughimMedicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Consanguineous marriage remains highly prevalent in Saudi Arabia and is strongly associated with increased rates of inherited genetic disorders, including sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia. The persistence of such marriages, driven by cultural and social factors, limits the effectiveness of existing preventive strategies such as premarital screening and genetic counselling. Methodology A cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted between November and December 2025 among 139 participants across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire was distributed via WhatsApp messaging groups and administered using Google Forms. The 17-item survey covered CRISPR awareness, perceptions of consanguinity and genetic disease risk, and attitudes toward CRISPR as a therapeutic intervention. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results Of 139 participants, 60.4% had previously heard of CRISPR; however, 55.4% demonstrated limited or no meaningful knowledge of the technology. Despite this, 96.4% expressed willingness to accept CRISPR-based treatment for inherited genetic disorders. Scientific safety, religious considerations, and cost were the most frequently cited factors influencing acceptance. Conclusions Public awareness of CRISPR in Saudi Arabia remains critically low despite high receptiveness to its therapeutic applications. Integrating targeted public education with CRISPR-based somatic cell interventions could represent an effective long-term strategy for reducing the burden of inherited genetic disorders associated with consanguineous marriage in Saudi Arabia.

Indexed as

consanguineous marriagecrispr gene editinggenetic disorderspublic awarenesssaudi arabia

Identifiers

PMID42657261
PMCPMC13508564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.