ArticleCureus2026
Consanguinity-Associated Genetic Disorders in Saudi Arabia: A Hypothesis on the Future Role of CRISPR-Based Gene Editing.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Consanguineous marriage remains highly prevalent in Saudi Arabia and is strongly associated with increased rates of inherited genetic disorders, including sickle cell disease and β-thalassemia. The persistence of such marriages, driven by cultural and social factors, limits the effectiveness of existing preventive strategies such as premarital screening and genetic counselling. Methodology A cross-sectional, survey-based study was conducted between November and December 2025 among 139 participants across Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire was distributed via WhatsApp messaging groups and administered using Google Forms. The 17-item survey covered CRISPR awareness, perceptions of consanguinity and genetic disease risk, and attitudes toward CRISPR as a therapeutic intervention. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. Results Of 139 participants, 60.4% had previously heard of CRISPR; however, 55.4% demonstrated limited or no meaningful knowledge of the technology. Despite this, 96.4% expressed willingness to accept CRISPR-based treatment for inherited genetic disorders. Scientific safety, religious considerations, and cost were the most frequently cited factors influencing acceptance. Conclusions Public awareness of CRISPR in Saudi Arabia remains critically low despite high receptiveness to its therapeutic applications. Integrating targeted public education with CRISPR-based somatic cell interventions could represent an effective long-term strategy for reducing the burden of inherited genetic disorders associated with consanguineous marriage in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.