ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026
Outpatients' cardiac rehabilitation: the long-term experience of the Niguarda Hospital.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a cornerstone of secondary prevention, yet long-term real-world data on outpatient programs remain limited. We report the long-term experience of a high-volume centre, evaluating clinical profiles, temporal trends, and functional and metabolic outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient CR. Methods: We analysed 1461 consecutive patients enrolled in the Niguarda Hospital outpatient CR program from 2012 to 2025. Demographic, clinical, angiographic, biochemical, hemodynamic, functional, and pharmacological data were collected at admission and discharge. Results: Acute coronary syndrome was the leading indication (70.8%), though its prevalence declined over time, paralleled by a progressive rise in chronic coronary syndrome and non-ischemic indications. Patients became older and more comorbid, yet consistently achieved significant improvements in functional capacity (Δ6MWT +28.4 ± 24.4%, p < 0.001), left ventricular ejection fraction (from 53.3 to 55.2%, p < 0.001), and lipid profile (LDL cholesterol from 99.6 ± 42.0 to 64.8 ± 26.2 mg/dL, p < 0.001). Rates of complete revascularization increased markedly, smoking patterns shifted toward cessation, and uptake of advanced cardioprotective therapies rose substantially. Despite reduced volumes and higher baseline complexity during COVID-19 (2020-21), CR effectiveness was preserved. Conclusions: Over 13 years, outpatient CR consistently delivered robust functional and metabolic benefits, even in an increasingly older and more complex population. Shifts in patient characteristics, improved revascularization rates, and evolution of pharmacological therapy underscore the expanding role of CR as a comprehensive, guideline-driven component of modern cardiovascular care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.