Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42657198›Full record

ArticleOrthopedic reviews2026

Body Mass Index and Clinical Characteristics Among Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Implant Removal: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Fouad Qupti, Nael Dabous, Waseem Jiris, Mokbil Shalah, Fadi Khalil Hanna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopedic reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fouad Qupti *Orthopedic Department Nazareth Hospital EMMS.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6894-8816
Nael Dabous *Orthopedic Department Nazareth Hospital EMMS.
Waseem JirisOrthopedic Department Nazareth Hospital EMMS.
Mokbil ShalahOrthopedic Department Nazareth Hospital EMMS.
Fadi Khalil Hanna *Orthopedic Department Nazareth Hospital EMMS.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe the body mass index (BMI) profile of patients who underwent orthopedic implant removal and to examine whether BMI was associated with age, sex, anatomical location, and broad symptomatic indication within the implant-removal cohort. Methods: A retrospective observational analysis was conducted using clinical records of orthopedic implant removal procedures. The analytic sample included 88 implant-removal procedures performed among 78 unique patients. BMI was calculated from recorded height and weight and categorized using standard clinical thresholds. Descriptive statistics were calculated for BMI, age, sex, and anatomical location. A one-sample t-test was used to determine whether mean BMI differed significantly from the overweight threshold of 25 kg/m². Pearson and Spearman correlations were used to examine the association between age and BMI. One-way ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to compare BMI across age groups and anatomical regions. Fisher's exact test was used to examine associations between high BMI, defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², and weight-bearing anatomical regions. A broad symptomatic-removal variable was also examined, based on documentation of pain, irritation, prominent hardware, protruding screw, prominent metalwork, or local pressure. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. Results: The study included 88 implant-removal procedures among 78 patients. Mean age was 44.9 ± 16.4 years, and mean BMI was 27.33 ± 5.06 kg/m², significantly above the overweight threshold (p < 0.001). Overall, 68.2% of cases had BMI ≥ 25. BMI was not significantly associated with sex. Age showed a positive correlation with BMI (p < 0.01). BMI differed significantly across age groups and anatomical regions. High BMI was more frequent in weight-bearing regions (90.0% vs. 61.8%, p = 0.027, OR = 5.57). Broad symptomatic removal was identified in 44.3% of cases and was more common in weight-bearing anatomical sites, especially lower-extremity locations. Conclusion: Patients undergoing orthopedic implant removal demonstrated a BMI profile predominantly within the overweight range, with higher BMI associated with older age and weight-bearing anatomical regions. These findings suggest that BMI may play a role in implant-related symptoms, particularly in lower-extremity sites exposed to mechanical loading. However, due to the absence of a non-removal comparison group, results should be interpreted as descriptive and hypothesis-generating rather than establishing causation.Keywords: body mass index; orthopedic implant removal; hardware removal; pain; irritation; obesity; anatomical location.

Indexed as

BMI(*)IMPLANT REMOVAL (*)

Identifiers

PMID42657198
PMCPMC13512469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.