ReviewCochrane evidence synthesis and methods2026
Bereaved Parents' Perspectives on Quality Pediatric End-of-Life Care: A Scoping Review.
Review in Cochrane evidence synthesis and methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pediatric end-of-life care profoundly impacts families, yet existing reviews on bereaved parents' experiences lack methodological rigor and comprehensive synthesis. Identifying key quality indicators from parents' perspectives is essential for improving care. Objectives: This scoping review synthesizes evidence on bereaved parents' views of high-quality pediatric end-of-life care, identifying critical domains and developing a thematic framework. Methods: We conducted a scoping review adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches in MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PsycArticles, and AMED included studies without date restrictions. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and conducted inductive thematic analysis. Results: From 4962 records, 20 studies (1997-2015) met inclusion criteria, comprising 16 qualitative and 4 quantitative studies. Three themes emerged: (1) Interpersonal Interaction (compassionate communication, shared decision-making); (2) Interdisciplinary Care (symptom management, emotional, spiritual, and sibling support); and (3) Practical Support (care accessibility, skilled staff, financial/logistical assistance). Conclusions: Bereaved parents advocate for a holistic, family-centred approach integrating empathetic communication, clinical expertise, and systemic support. These findings inform quality improvement initiatives and policy development in pediatric palliative care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.