Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42657144›Full record

ArticleACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine2026

Understanding Channel Complementarity for Multiplex Cell Segmentation.

Haotian Ma, Yi Lin, Elizabeth Godschall, Bruno Matuck, Kevin Matthew Byrd, Yifan Peng, Jinze Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Haotian MaWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Yi LinWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth GodschallVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Bruno MatuckHospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Kevin Matthew ByrdVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Yifan PengWeill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
Jinze LiuVirginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.

Funding

Multimodal AI Fusion Model for Early Detection for Pancreatic CancerR01CA289249 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ARIZONA · PI Imon Banerjee, Yifan Peng · 2024 to 2026
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA289249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate cell segmentation in high-plex imaging remains challenging because no single biomarker channel captures the full structural diversity of cells, and many practical segmentation backbones are trained on a small, fixed-channel input convention. In this work, we study channel complementarity under the standard three-channel input convention of Cellpose-SAM using a systematic fused-evaluation framework with combination-specific operating-point calibration. On a primary healthy salivary gland region, we show that multi-channel gains are selective but meaningful: the strongest pair improves over the single-channel baseline, and the strongest triplet further improves over the best pair. On a second held-out diseased tissue region, we identify strong auxiliary combinations centered on EPCAM, and the triplet combination (DAPI, EPCAM, CD31) remains beneficial across both regions. To test whether these gains are artifacts of conservative post-processing, we additionally perform controlled-merge sensitivity analysis across the merge hyperparameter grid. These analyses do not reproduce the fused triplet gains, suggesting that the observed improvements arise from joint multi-channel inference rather than from the merge heuristic itself. Together, our results show that higher-order channel complementarity is real but selective under the standard three-channel input convention of Cellpose-SAM, and that reproducible triplet benefits can be identified through systematic search.

Indexed as

Applied computing → ImagingCellposecell segmentationComputing methodologies → Biometricsmulti-channel imaging

Identifiers

PMID42657144
PMCPMC13512904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.