Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42657092›Full record

ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2026

Slow march to surgery: using the COM-B model to explore the lived experience of individuals with knee osteoarthritis, awaiting joint replacement surgery.

Nathan Brookes, Yeliz Prior, Stephen Preece, Jennifer Parker, Simone Battista

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathan BrookesCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, The University of Salford, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1126-1092
Yeliz PriorCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, The University of Salford, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-6254
Stephen PreeceCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, The University of Salford, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2434-732X
Jennifer ParkerCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, The University of Salford, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2235-5748
Simone BattistaCentre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, The University of Salford, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-1951

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the lived experiences of people with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) awaiting Total Knee Replacement (TKR). Methods: Fifteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants with a diagnosis of KOA. Transcripts were first analysed inductively with reflexive thematic analysis. Inductive themes were deductively aligned to the COM-B model ('Capability', 'Opportunity', 'Motivation' and 'Behaviour') to provide additional understanding of how people navigate the management of KOA and their experiences while awaiting surgery. Results: Four inductive themes were generated and mapped into the COM-B component. (1) 'Altered health beliefs drive a biomedical focus on KOA management' (Capability): participants largely understood KOA as an inevitably degenerative condition culminating in surgery. (2) 'Interactions with healthcare professionals reinforce surgical inevitability' (Opportunity): participants described clinical encounters that strengthened their biomedical interpretations and shaped expectations of surgery as the primary solution. (3) 'The emotional burden of KOA' (Motivation): emotional strain contributed to decisions to pursue surgery. (4) 'Coping strategies for managing KOA pain' (Behaviour): participants employed a range of self-directed strategies to manage symptoms while awaiting surgery, often with limited guidance. Conclusion: This study provides a novel, theory-informed understanding of how people awaiting TKR make sense of, engage with, and manage KOA. Using the COM-B model to map these experiences illustrates how current pathways can unintentionally weaken motivation and opportunity to engage with evidence-based first-line interventions like exercise. These findings indicate the value of supporting people with KOA to better understand and access first-line options before considering surgery.

Indexed as

behaviour changeCOM-B modelcoping strategieshealth beliefshealthcare interactionsknee osteoarthritislived experiencenon-surgical managementqualitative researchtotal knee replacement

Identifiers

PMID42657092
PMCPMC13509947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.